I think you’re just repeating old calumnies against them. 

calumny
noun

• A false statement maliciously made to injure another's reputation.

I posted a letter from Bishop Castro de Meyer. Are you accusing the good bishop of lying?

The topic of this thread is Bishop Castro De Meyer, so I posted a letter written by the good Bishop to a grieving mother who was one of many who lost their young teenage sons to the TFP Plinio- worshiping cult. Their sons were trafficked to other countries, their sons were turned against their parents, taught by TFP that "My parents are the genesis of my revolution."

The other post was in regard to civil charges against TFP for their criminal cнιℓd тrαffιcking (not child sex trafficking, just cнιℓd тrαffιcking).

Facts are facts. Facts are not calumny.

On topic, I have just found this on the Campos Administration website.

Google translation from Portuguese:

"Note, however, that in the time of Dom Antônio's episcopate, who preferred and celebrated the Mass in the old rite, from 1969 (when the New Mass was promulgated) until 1981 (when Dom Antônio became emeritus), there was in the diocese of Campos, parishes and churches where the Mass of Saint Pius V was celebrated, alongside parishes and churches where the Mass of Paul VI was celebrated, with the permission of the Diocesan Bishop, who preserved, and even appointed as parish priests, priests who only celebrated in the new rite."

Modernists are often also big liars, but if this is true, it speaks a lot in disfavour of Bp. Castro Mayer.

Perhaps you could check further to find out IF it is true prior to posting an attack on Bishop Meyer (who was a close friend of Bishop Williamson) making this speculation doubtful.

Perhaps you could check further to find out IF it is true prior to posting an attack on Bishop Meyer (who was a close friend of Bishop Williamson) making this speculation doubtful.

Posting something I found online and saying that it could not be true is not exactly an attack on anybody. It is merely a report.

I have also found this citation from Dr. David Allen White's book. It seems to confirm the citation I posted earlier:

"Almost all parishes throughout the diocese had preserved the Tridentine Mass. "

If "almost all" preserved, it can only be assumed that some did not preserve. In other words, New Mass was celebrated on his diocese.

I don't think that it invalidates his work. It is perfectly understandable, given the situation that he was in. How can you prohibit a Priest from saying the Mass that the Pope says, without turning your diocese into a schismatic group?
Leading a Priestly Society is very different from leading a diocesis.

Anyway, facts are facts, and Dr. David Allen White is more trustworthy than the current Campos leaders.

Tradition In Action, which is a TFP mouthpiece, although there is a contrived distance between the two, accuses Archbishop Lefebvre (it has Guérard des Lauriers making the claim) of saying a Novus Ordo, which is unlikely and bizarre given how the first saying of an early form of it shocked him to the core, or having a personal Masonic brass band, or that the Archbishop was invalidly ordained by +Achille Liénart.

Now the present Personal Administration of St John Vianney which continues the work of Abp Mayer, is headed by Bishop Rifan who has been pictured concelebrating a Novus Ordo with Pope Francis. And +Rifan has concelebrated Novus Ordos a few times. Pope Francis might ask the heads of FSSP or ICKSP if they will be good boys like +Rifan and concelebrate a Novus Ordo with him.

Why do you think the differences between TFP and TIA are contrived?

From what I’ve learned their differences are well docuмented and substantial (e.g., Atila’s “Defense”).

TFP accepts Consiliarism and TIA does not.  

TFP would never publicly acknowledge that the docuмents of Vatican II were based on non-Catholic theology.

Whereas, TIA is founded on this notion. It was the key connection between Plineo and Atila.