Author Topic: The Heretical Pope Fallacy (Read 73750 times)

Ladislaus · « **Reply #230 on:** January 09, 2018, 08:02:48 AM »

Quote from: Stubborn on January 09, 2018, 04:30:58 AM

Cantarella, you are describing what you and the other sedes believe to be the rule of faith.

Correction. She is describing what CATHOLICS hold to be the rule of faith.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #231 on:** January 09, 2018, 08:04:34 AM »

Quote from: Stubborn on January 09, 2018, 04:30:58 AM

If the Magisterium as defined above, is in fact the proximate rule of faith, then all true trads are either in error, or they are in schism. Period. There is no other option.

Uhm, except that the Pope(s) who taught these things was/were not legitimate.

Stubborn · « **Reply #232 on:** January 09, 2018, 08:10:38 AM »

Quote from: Ladislaus on January 09, 2018, 08:04:34 AM

Uhm, except that the Pope(s) who taught these things was/were not legitimate.

Uhm, you cannot say that unless you have no faith at all in what you say is the rule of faith.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #233 on:** January 09, 2018, 08:11:29 AM »

Quote from: Stubborn on January 09, 2018, 08:10:38 AM

Uhm, you cannot say that unless you have no faith at all in what you say is the rule of faith.

Logic isn't your strength, is it?

Stubborn · « **Reply #234 on:** January 09, 2018, 08:18:19 AM »

Quote from: Ladislaus on January 09, 2018, 08:11:29 AM

Logic isn't your strength, is it?

Reality isn't yours (that's not a question).

If you believe what you say is the rule of faith, then there is not even the slightest possibility of an illegitimate pope. Simple.

You do know that sumfin's wrong, but an illegitimate pope cannot be part of your formula. I guess you'll have to keep guessing.

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: The Heretical Pope Fallacy (Read 73750 times)

Ladislaus

Re: The Heretical Pope Fallacy

Ladislaus

Re: The Heretical Pope Fallacy

Stubborn

Re: The Heretical Pope Fallacy

Ladislaus

Re: The Heretical Pope Fallacy

Stubborn

Re: The Heretical Pope Fallacy