Not hostile to tradition. Although progressivists are misguided, there IS a way to "move forward". I said "basic Catholic teachings" which is true, I think it's definitely a distortion to say they don't teach the 10 commandments or about the Fall, etc. - I speak on experience of having gone to Novus Ordo schools up through college. In fairness to traditional critique, they often teach modernist garbage, tolerate sins, are sloppy, etc. Conservative Novus Ordo still gets basic teachings out there though.
Will someone add on good things the conciliar church is doing? That's extremely distorted thinking to say they're doing NOTHING good. Challenge: everyone add ONE GOOD THING the conciliar church is doing! I agree they're doing a lot of bad things which need to be addressed, yet it is just this distorted thinking that turns away conciliar Catholics from tradition. Who wants to join traditional groups who judge conciliar Catholics (even if they judge justly)? A lot of those people may not even think they're doing anything wrong and don't understand what they're doing wrong, and I haven't seen traditionalists instructing them much. They may be like misguided children, patience with them is needed. You know that Jesus said, "Father, forgive them, FOR THEY KNOW NOT WHAT THEY DO". Also, that Jesus forgave the woman caught in adultery - who was without sin to condemn her? Neither did Jesus condemn her. However, some Novus Ordo ARE knowingly guilty - is this more often than not? Depends on the person and issue, probably.
In comparing the conciliar Church to protestant churches, you still aren't refuting that they're doing good - lots of good, to the tune of millions of people.
There is plenty about the conciliar church that is uniquely Catholic. No woman priests, no contraception, no gαy marriage, etc. Seriously, trads are really distorting these things out of proportion, and it can work to the detriment of traditional causes. They have seen the conciliar church be "catholic" in theory only and thrown in the towel after experiencing abuse after abuse after abuse. But what about correcting the abuses? I mean it can really be easy to retire to the monastery or small sede chapel, in this respect - they're not dealing with governing MILLIONS of people.
One must acknowledge the problem of politics in all of this. I know a lot of people are conspiracy theorists out there in this trad world. If the popes take drastic traditional action, they will lose progressivists in the Church as well as maybe put themselves up for martyrdom by secular mobsters. Do you realize this, that if they take a stand, they could be done for? There is something of rationality in what is going on governed by worldly forces. You may say, "well, they should have courage and sacrifice themselves!" Ok, possibly true - maybe God's not calling them to do that though, eh? The Church may be being led to its crucifixion, its end time. Jesus submitted to his crucifixion. Is it possible the recent popes have been just as power-less?
So, I'm just entertaining these possibilities here. This ain't like the past ages of the Church. The Church is the largest it ever has been (or was up until Vatican 2) and IS dealing with new, modern problems and arrangements. It may take different policies and organization to work with a Church so large. The Church is also dealing with more powerful secular organizations which have become emboldened as the spread of sin increases in the world. Again, if you've been in politics, taking a "hard line" stance just makes you look insane these days. The conciliar Church COULD do that, but if it does, there are predictable disastrous results, which is why all it can do is basically take lukewarm action and be crucified in a sense.
Pray for our world and the salvation of souls!