Author Topic: The Gifts of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs (Read 5761 times)

Elizabeth · « **Reply #60 on:** October 17, 2014, 10:14:07 AM »

Quote from: shin

"The death of the impenitent persecutors of the Church will take place during the three days of darkness. He who survives those three days of darkness and horror will see himself as if alone, because the earth will be covered with cadavers".

St. Gaspar del Bufalo[/quote

In other words, REPENT, Poche!

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #61 on:** October 18, 2014, 09:16:22 PM »

The secret is out on Poche.

He is "lizbola".

MrYeZe · « **Reply #62 on:** October 18, 2014, 09:20:40 PM »

Quote

Self-loathing when they finally realize what they are doing to their minds, souls and bodies.

Oh, no, you see, any depression that ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs feel is the result of angry religious people always making them feel bad, even in territories that are tolerant to gαys.

I mean, what other explanation could there be? That people feel bad about preforming ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ acts because they're wrong? Oh nooooooooo.

Disputaciones · « **Reply #63 on:** October 19, 2014, 11:30:27 AM »

Why do some people keep feeding this poche troll and take him seriously?

The best thing is to ignore him 100% and never reply to anything he says.

AlligatorDicax · « **Reply #64 on:** October 19, 2014, 02:00:02 PM »

Quote from: #29: BTNYC (Oct 16, 2014, 4:33 pm)

[...] rack up 15,000+ posts between CI and Fisheaters--as Poche has--[...] by copy and pasting fluff pieces [...],

A server-bloating habit that I've criticized in the past as "shovel(l)ing".

Quote from: #29: BTNYC (Oct 16, 2014, 4:33 pm)

creating numerous textless posts that consist only of a single emoticon,

Worse when the replies in which the only content 'poche' adds is a single emoticon--which by itself is a modernized 'me too' violation of netiquette--are bloated by quoting the whole screen-long (or longer) posting, as needlessly redundant context from which to hang the emoticon.

Quote from: #29: BTNYC (Oct 16, 2014, 4:33 pm)

blithely replying on serious threads with either NO / Conciliar talking points or full-on intellectually dishonest circuмlocutions or pious-sounding rhetoric that does not address the issue or contribute anything of substance

I envision a prim & puritanical converted Protestant who's unable to connect worldly reality, cause, and effect.

I agree with your point about "common courtesy" only as violated by the posting habits of 'poche' that you described above. I consider them every bit as irritating as other CathInfo members who've complained specifically about her|him in recent years.

Quote from: #29: BTNYC (Oct 16, 2014, 4:33 pm)

[...]

But you've overreached on 1 complaint, indirectly identified by the ordering in your text of my elision in red.

AlligatorDicax · « **Reply #65 on:** October 19, 2014, 04:00:17 PM »

Quote from: #28: ClarkSmith (Oct 16, 2014, 11:51 am)

Why did you create 17 separate posts? You could have fit every point in 1 post. Now it is a pain to scroll through all the pages.

Just because all the points could be crammed into a single posting, it does not logically follow that they should be.

Quote from: #43: poche (Oct 16, 2014, 11:51 pm)

I created different posts because I wanted to respond to the points individually.

This is at least a reasonable practice, and in many instances, it's even a laudable practice, for focusing a discussion on the points actually being discussed.

The opposite style, which is cluelessly common on Internet message-boards, is for replies to repeatedly quote whole screen-long (or longer) postings--sometimes in multiple layers--only to respond to a single sentence or a few sentences. That abusively bloats not only the storage required by a Web server, but also the amount of data it must transfer over the network, both of which have limits for Web-hosting accounts. The limits are enforced either by shutting down public access to the server, or by suddenly imposing additional charges. In the case of CathInfo, we all should consider that the Web server being abused is the one that Matthew is personally paying for. It's he who is the ultimate victim of having CathInfo shut down or incurring additional charges. Yet this excessive-quoting habit is common even among some of the more established CathInfo members.

It's much more of "a pain to scroll" through a topic that's accuмulated postings in the latter style: The pain of much more scrolling, and the dissatisfaction of displaying much less new content for each reader's effort. And not only is that a pet peeve of mine, but also one established decades ago.

Quote from: #29: BTNYC (Oct 16, 2014, 4:33 pm)

[...] one doesn't rack up 15,000+ posts between CI and Fisheaters [...] by practicing that kind of common courtesy. One acheives that feat by [...] spreading a single post's worth of material across as many individual posts as possible.

When the original material is so logically separated that its points can be sensibly presented as bulleted items or even numbered items, separating them into separate replies is not a violation of Internet courtesy a.k.a. netiquette at all. Quite the contrary: It is conforming to it. Eventual replies to separated items will likely be shorter and better focused.

I'd like to post a link to a presentation of netiquette (i.e.: "net" + "etiquette) that's modernized for WIMP-interface

Internet forums
, so readers would be able to recognize violations of it, but they seem to be becoming as scarce as discussions of "sin" in the Novus Ordo religion.

But I digress.

Note *: WIMP = windows + icons + mice + pointers.
Note #: As distinct from the ARPAnet/Usenet mailing lists and Usenet news groups from which they descended.

Viva Cristo Rey · « **Reply #66 on:** October 19, 2014, 05:51:20 PM »

Quote from: Cantarella

The Gifts of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs

The Synod would like us to recognize the "gifts" of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs. Here are just a few, in no particular order:

1. Self-loathing when they finally realize what they are doing to their minds, souls and bodies.

2. Hepatitus-B

3. The destruction of an adolescent boy's innocence, mind, ability to reason and degradation, when they are buggered by sodomites.

4. Catholic dioceses facing bankruptcy in order to pay off the victims of buggery by ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ priests.

5. Shame, enduring shame, the stain of which will never be wiped off.

6. The entire Catholic Faith called into question by astounded onlookers who cannot believe what they are seeing.

7. A catastrophic fall in conversions to the true Faith.

8. The mockery and jibes of the world, especially our Orthodox friends who can now say, "See, I told you so".

9. The spread of AIDS.

10. Good priests being driven mad by ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ priests, Bishops, Cardinals as they try to uphold the tatters of the authentic teachings of Jesus Christ.

11. Good priests being driven to leave the priesthood altogether due to the new "thinking" (if you can call it that) on homos and those gifts they bring.

12. Seminaries that drive out good men (need I elaborate on this?)

13. The Church driving Her children to despair - something Popes and Bishops will pay for one day.

14. The credibility of the Church shattered almost beyond repair.

15. Ruined lives.

16. Murder

Lastly, one more gift...

17. The anger of God as He sees His Church embrace one of the sins that cry to Heaven for vengeance.

If the Synod continues in the direction that was already staged and choreographed from the beginning, and if the Pope allows this to go on (as so far he is) then it is not unreasonable to say that the Gates of Hell are at the very point of prevailing.

It is 5 minutes to midnight, Pope Francis.

http://theeye-witness.blogspot.com/2014/10/the-gifts-of-ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs.html

-------------------------------------

Drugs, alcohol and sometimes ѕυιcιdє.

poche · « **Reply #67 on:** October 20, 2014, 08:43:43 AM »

Quote from: Elizabeth

Quote from: poche
Quote from: Elizabeth
Quote from: poche
Quote from: PerEvangelicaDicta
Quote
We do not live in the times of Pope St Pius V.

Quote
While the world changes, the cross stands firm. -St. Bruno

The cross stands firm but what was prudent jurisprudence in the times of Pope St Pis V is not the same today.

Doctors of the Church like St. John Crystostom are very, very severe in their
treatment of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity. When Holy Mother the Church made Doctors, what they teach must be listened to until the end of time, forever and ever.

Truth does not change, or else t was never Truth.

You are correct. Religous truth does not change with time. However politiccal and juridical realities do change with time.

With this logic, you render the Ten Commandments obsolete. The Cross cannot stand firm in your mindset. There were a number of political and juridical issues around the time of the Crucifixion which are not the same as today.

*Woe to those who call evil good*

There is more joy in Heaven over the conversion of one sinner than of the 99 who are in no need of conversion. - Jesus

poche · « **Reply #68 on:** October 20, 2014, 08:49:53 AM »

Quote from: MrYeZe

Quote
Self-loathing when they finally realize what they are doing to their minds, souls and bodies.

Oh, no, you see, any depression that ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs feel is the result of angry religious people always making them feel bad, even in territories that are tolerant to gαys.

I mean, what other explanation could there be? That people feel bad about preforming ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ acts because they're wrong? Oh nooooooooo.

The sadness and depression is a part of the mercy of God. If the warning is heeded then a soul may be saved.

claudel · « **Reply #69 on:** October 20, 2014, 09:18:25 AM »

Quote from: AlligatorDicax

Quote from: #43: poche (Oct 16, 2014, 11:51 pm)
I created different posts because I wanted to respond to the points individually.

This is at least a reasonable practice, and in many instances, it's even a laudable practice, for focusing a discussion on the points actually being discussed.

The opposite style, which is cluelessly common on Internet message-boards, is for replies to repeatedly quote whole screen-long (or longer) postings--sometimes in multiple layers--only to respond to a single sentence or a few sentences. That abusively bloats not only the storage required by a Web server, but also the amount of data it must transfer over the network, both of which have limits for Web-hosting accounts. The limits are enforced either by shutting down public access to the server, or by suddenly imposing additional charges. In the case of CathInfo, we all should consider that the Web server being abused is the one that Matthew is personally paying for. It's he who is the ultimate victim of having CathInfo shut down or incurring additional charges. Yet this excessive-quoting habit is common even among some of the more established CathInfo members.

It's much more of "a pain to scroll" through a topic that's accuмulated postings in the latter style: The pain of much more scrolling, and the dissatisfaction of displaying much less new content for each reader's effort. And not only is that a pet peeve of mine, but also one established decades ago. …

When the original material is so logically separated that its points can be sensibly presented as bulleted items or even numbered items, separating them into separate replies is not a violation of Internet courtesy a.k.a. netiquette at all. Quite the contrary: It is conforming to it. Eventual replies to separated items will likely be shorter and better focused.

I very much appreciate your spelling this matter out in some detail.

I read all your comments with interest.* I have learned something I didn't know or been reminded of something I had long forgotten in virtually every one of them. Thank you.

Quote from: AlligatorDicax

I'd like to post a link to a presentation of netiquette (i.e.: "net" + "etiquette) that's modernized for WIMP-interface Internet forums, so readers would be able to recognize violations of it, but they seem to be becoming as scarce as discussions of "sin" in the Novus Ordo religion.

Please do so. I for one would read it with interest.
_______
*That is more than I can say for some of my own.