…One might conclude…
As plain as the nose on your face, "one
might conclude" is NOT dispositive, but is only
speculation.
I
do conclude that
nowhere in any of the declarative statements is there explicitly a call for a "three-within-three" rubric.
I did not ask for "what makes sense to [you]." I asked for a
statement of definitive authority and received… the
speculation of someone without jurisdiction. Bait and switch.
If I am silly for being bothered by this, how much sillier is the person who can only offer what "one might conclude"?
"One might conclude" that "three-within-three" is in the same canonical category as clown "Masses."