Attending the Masses of priests with no ministry in the Church against the order of the pope doesn't sound like respecting his jurisdiction. When's the last time you listened or paid heed to, much less obeyed, any order of the pope? You said yourself that the SSPX should ignore him entirely.
You say you recognise his "universal jurisdiction" - but to you that phrase is entirely meaningless.
You neglect to incorporate the supreme rule into your accusations:
"First we are under obedience to God, only then under obedience to man."For me, this rule is supreme and it applies always and everywhere to everyone, including laymen, priests, bishops and popes - but for me, it especially applies to me.
It sounds like you not live by this rule, and/or you believe that some people are immune from living by it. But I do not believe that.
It sounds as if you think we are some how forced to obey the popes heretical ideas, opinions, wishes and examples, even though doing so violates the supreme rule. I mean, it sounds like you think all those people who violate the supreme rule did not do so of their own free will, that some how they do so at the point of a gun or something.
It seems as if you do not understand the concept of true obedience, or perhaps you go by the new concept of what obedience is, which is blind obedience, of which no Catholic above the age of reason is permitted.