Author Topic: The Crisis in the Church - an analogy (food for thought!) (Read 4820 times)

MyrnaM · « **Reply #5 on:** September 06, 2010, 04:49:43 PM »

You can judge for yourself after you look into this:

http://www.calefactory.org/misc-v2-v2ritesaretheyvalid.htm

Alexandria · « **Reply #6 on:** September 06, 2010, 04:59:24 PM »

Quote from: MyrnaM

You can judge for yourself after you look into this:

http://www.calefactory.org/misc-v2-v2ritesaretheyvalid.htm

Myrna, have you ever heard of the author of this article before?

MyrnaM · « **Reply #7 on:** September 06, 2010, 05:24:14 PM »

Everytime anyone reads something they don't like they attack the author or messenger. The information is what CMRI and all the Sede chapels say.

But if I posted something from the CMRI web site it would have been attacked also.

I suggest you come to the conference in Oct. at the Mount, and I will pay your way, so don't say you can't afford it. You will learn a lot.

Alexandria · « **Reply #8 on:** September 06, 2010, 05:47:15 PM »

Quote from: MyrnaM

Everytime anyone reads something they don't like they attack the author or messenger. The information is what CMRI and all the Sede chapels say.

But if I posted something from the CMRI web site it would have been attacked also.

I suggest you come to the conference in Oct. at the Mount, and I will pay your way, so don't say you can't afford it. You will learn a lot.

Do I have a bulls eye on me today?

Will you please tell me where you got

Quote

Everytime anyone reads something they don't like they attack the author or messenger.

from this

Quote

Myrna, have you ever heard of the author of this article before?

I ask you a civil question and all I got was a nasty response.

Forgive me if I don't trust everyone that I read. I never heard of this man before -- ever. If he is such a trustworthy source, why isn't he ever in the Reign of Mary or, for that matter, The Four Marks?

MaterDominici · « **Reply #9 on:** September 06, 2010, 06:27:07 PM »

Quote from: Recusant

Quote from: Matthew
Those who believe the Novus Ordo is invalid should be able to say exactly WHY -- and "Ick!" isn't a good enough reason.

Why? Because it is based on a lie. Our Lord did not say "for all" He said "for many" and popes, doctors and catechisms have explained why "for many" MUST be used.

And so you would agree that a Latin NO is valid? ...and that ALL NO Masses will be valid when the new translations are implemented next year??