Dogmatic Definition of 1870

Vatican Council, Sess. IV, Const. de Ecclesiâ Christi, c. iv, holds:

    We teach and define that it is a dogma Divinely revealed that the Roman pontiff when he speaks ex cathedra, that is when in discharge of the office of pastor and doctor of all Christians, by virtue of his supreme Apostolic authority, he defines a doctrine regarding faith or morals to be held by the universal Church, by the Divine assistance promised to him in Blessed Peter, is possessed of that infallibility with which the Divine Redeemer willed that his Church should be endowed in defining doctrine regarding faith or morals, and that therefore such definitions of the Roman pontiff are of themselves and not from the consent of the Church irreformable.

Solemn definitions promulgated by ecuмenical councils of the Catholic Church and affirmed by the Pope, such as the dogmatic definition quoted above, are themselves considered infallible.

Here yet is another example of the modern Church, includes the SSPX, being part of the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr and its evil agenda. Papal infallibility...how can ANYONE honestly believe this nonsense after all the crap connected to the Catholic Church, the Popes and their henchmen over the years?

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14998#When:23:43:11Z

Yeah, it's liberation theology, and your point is?  So what?  Modern heretics at work.  No longer content to preach the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ, that no one comes to God the Father except through His One and Only Son, Jesus Christ, these heretics have intended their own "gospel" based upon the "findings" of higher Biblical criticism, which allows one to substitute any reading of the New Testament that one wants.  Modern Catholic Theology = Agnosticism + Any crap that one wants.

Here yet is another example of the modern Church, includes the SSPX, being part of the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr and its evil agenda. Papal infallibility...how can ANYONE honestly believe this nonsense after all the crap connected to the Catholic Church, the Popes and their henchmen over the years?

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/14998#When:23:43:11Z

What is ACORN? Does it have anything to do with Faith or Morals? If not, then you've just pulled a puerile Protestant attempt at discrediting the intelligence of Catholics (with of course the obligatory "all the crap connected to the Church and the popes, etc").

I want to have a list of books that you have read about the history of the Catholic Church and the Popes. Have you read the highly acclaimed "History of the Popes" by Dr. Ludwig Pastor? If you have not, and do not have access to a copy of the multi-volume (I think that there are more than 30 volumes, although I am not sure) series, which is most likely the case, as they are rather rare tomes nowadays, I can give you a link to them all available for free to read online. You evidently have only an elementary understanding of the Catholic Faith as you commonly use textbook examples of Protestant objections to the Catholic Religion based on bad historical analysis, flawed Biblical exegesis, or just plain bad will or idiocy.

I am not claiming to be learned in these matters, but I know enough to know that most of your claims are just Protestant rubbish that has been refuted a thousand times (and will continue to be for ten times a thousand more times if most Protestants are like the ones that I have met online).

One does not need to be a traditional Catholic or even Catholic to see real evils in the world. Some of the better saints never believed in the total Catholic dogma and look were they are now.

Yes you do (need to be Catholic). Does the average atheist on Prison Planet or God-Like Productions truly understand the major conspiracy in play? No, they do not. They see the pawns moving, but they can't see the one who is moving them (Satan). And if they don't, they'll just end up in checkmate like all the masses that they fancy themselves to be above. This is exactly where you are Uriel. You've been to wrapped up in conspiracy theories that you've allowed yourself to believe in the most idiotic propositions put forth by man. You'll end up raving on about some "Black Pope" or the Jesuits or about Ancient Astronauts/Demons, etc (Jesus Christ lived for 33 years! What do you know, He must have been a Freemason!). In the end, everything becomes a conspiracy and you'll lose all trust in anything and everything. If you end up like that, you are just about as useless as the average citizen.

+PAX IN MARIA+

Nguyen Thuy Dan

Vladimir is not denying that the enemies of the Church are trying to destroy Her.

He is urging Uriel to stop taking the lazy, Protestant way and to study The History of the Popes.

He wants her to pray more and not be so concerned with worldly matters, it appears to me.

Uriel is a she?

Uriel,

You are knowingly and willingly going out of your way to undermine your dying, if not already-dead, faith.  At the same time, you ignore good advice about how to shore up your leaking vessel.  In the interests of others, please keep the "fruits" of this willfully-destructive process to yourself.

I think that it is very well established that the modern Catholic Church does support left-wing organizations, which is why I do not donate to my diocese, only to my local parish.

It IS well-established (as ALL here know), as is Uriel's habitual willingness to expose her shaky faith to things that are plainly undermining it.  As you can see from the use of the hand clapping smilies, you have, unwittingly, encouraged her.  To you, in all kindness, I say, "Stop."