Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: E. Michael Jones on Viganò's "excommunication"  (Read 1060 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: E. Michael Jones on Viganò's "excommunication"
« Reply #5 on: July 09, 2024, 01:26:24 PM »
Quote from: Viva Cristo Rey on July 09, 2024, 01:23:14 PM
John Paul made Bergolio a cardinal.  Are the images of Ratzinger giving devil hand gestures authentic or photo shopped?

If the Sspx joined with the Vatican Ii hierarchy, then they just might be in schism.  Vatican II lacks the four marks of the Church.  Vatican II promotes a false gospel of Jesus.
If the thumb is extended, it is the American Sign Language for "Love."
If the thumb is flexed, it is the devil's horn sign.
Logged

Offline Geremia

heresy > schism
« Reply #6 on: July 09, 2024, 01:59:26 PM »
The main issue with his argument is that he thinks schism is a greater sin than heresy {perhaps ∵ schism is against "the unity of ecclesiastical charity" (II-II q. 39 a. 1 ad 3), heresy against faith, and charity > faith (1 Cor. 13:13}. However (II-II q. 39 a. 2 co.):
Quote from: St. Thomas Aquinas
unbelief [heresy] is a sin committed against God Himself, according as He is Himself the First Truth, on which faith is founded; whereas schism is opposed to ecclesiastical unity, which is a participated good, and a lesser good than God Himself. Wherefore it is manifest that the sin of unbelief [heresy] is generically more grievous than the sin of schism
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »