One of the reasons I tend to discount conspiracy theories is because people make statements that are easily verifiable to the contrary.
That they didn't bother to fact check, tells me they want to believe the conspiracy rather than they want to only believe it, if the weight of evidence leaves them no other choice.
I believe in the 911 conspiracy for 1 reason alone. Building 7 of the World Trade Centre. It comes down exactly like a controlled demolition. You would shake the hand of the demolition expert who could bring you builfing down as neatly I have never seen a justification of why it would collapse like that when it was not hit by an aeroplane and had zero jet fuel burnjng inside it. I watch it live on BBC TV and thought it was weird on the day it happened. Buildings just dont pancake neatly like that. My father is a building research scientist who worked for the UK goverment at the Building Research Establishment.
If it is due to random fires then show me any other burning building that has collapsed that neatly.
And why go to the expense of blowing a building up when fire can bring it down just as neatly? Demolition experts could save months and millions of dollars.
Yet, give me a good reason for it falling like that and I would believe it fell.
Likewise, for 2 Sister Lucia's I want hard evidence I cannot explain within a couple of Google searches. So far I have seen nothing like that.