It's the most manifestly heretical move for anyone to claim that the Baltimore Catechism, approved by a pope specifically to teach Catholic doctrine in America, (and anywhere in the world someone wishes to use it)...could possibly contain error against a previously defined solemn dogma. Particularly when we see generations live and die learning from. It is the most outrageously heretical arrogance.
Absolute garbage. You dogmatic sedevacantists have a mental illness. Now it's "heretical" to claim that an approved Catechism could contain error. Show me the dogmatic definition which anathematizes someone who claims that catechisms can contain error.
In fact, there are a couple of errors known to exist in the Roman Catechism ... misstatements made by whoever wrote the passages. To claim that these are, for all intents and purposes, as inerrant as Holy Scripture is utterly absurd.
At least Augustinus has the sense to qualify his assertion with matters that are taught universally across the Church. You have no shame in asserting that the Baltimore Catechism is inerrant in its own right, and the insanity to claim that anyone who denies the infallibility of the Baltimore Catechism is a "heretic".
You have exposed yourself as a complete idiotic buffoon. Now you declare me guilty of "manifest heresy" for denying the infallibility of the Baltimore Catechism. What a joke. Your charges of "manifest heresy" against the V2 popes have never sounded so hollow.
Nado, your stupidity is downright mind-numbing.
Topic: The Active and Passive Infalliblity of the Church (Read 1472 times)