The Pre-Conciliar Church, focusing on salvation of non-Catholics in Her role as guardian of souls, once rightly pointed out the fatal deficiencies in false religion and the need for the conversion of non-Christians for salvation. The Council docuмents, in contrast, shifted perspective from a concerned Mother warning non-Christian souls of danger, to the perspective of an observer who praises non-Christians for the elements of truth they get correct.
This latter approach is similar to a doctor praising a patient for eating a good diet, having good blood pressure, and maintaining low cholesterol while neglecting to tell him he has cancer. Indeed, what good does it do one to worship a Creator, yet reject Christ and the Church He established for salvation? As St. Paul said, “Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under Heaven given to men by which we must be saved.”

The writer must not know about salvation by belief in a God that rewards, for CathInfo's Lover of Truth  would tell you that they can be saved, as that is practically the only subject he writes about here.

Combine the heresy of CathInfo's Lover of Truth and the Vatican II church that people can be saved without belief in Christ (or the Holy Trinity, or water baptism, or explicit desire to be a Catholic) and the Vatican II teaching that all religions who worship a creator god  worship the same God as the Catholic Church, and you end up a perfect conciliarists (member of the Vatican II sect) and ecuмenist.