Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
This is, what many Trads don't want to understand. Another translation goes:That's how things look like, by divine law. It's the will of the Lord that we reject, shun, and fight heretics.
I've noticed a pattern in that sedevacantists will, at times, post a hypothetical, such as the above, and then procede to posit a thesis based on the hypothetical, as if it were indeed "fact." But a hypothetical is not necessarily a fact, so it seems odd to base a thesis on it. Did Aquinas ever do this? I don't recall that he had ever done so.
Ok, thanks! Want to tell which one?
Certain of my views, such as those on Communicatio in Sacris, “dogmatic” Sedevacantism, Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus, and the Jєωιѕн Question would be viewed as extreme and would limit my abilities to contribute in the future to numerous publications and would also negatively impact my current job position so I would rather not indulge this detail. My apologies in advance.