CathInfo.com

They all go together, but to be accurate it is not homo clerical predators, it is homo clericals. You can't have one homo priest, let alone the up to 50% that you have today.

I can't make sense of what you are saying. Can you explain please.

At least he's standing up for something in the moral realm, just like some of those Cardinals did against Amoris Laetitiae.

Sometimes the enemy of my enemy is my friend.  Anything that begins to expose these men for the wicked scoundrels that they truly are can't be all that bad.  Perhaps the teflon Bergoglio has against being attacked by the media might have worn really thin here.  One more proverbial feather on the camel's back, and Bergoglio could be forced or shamed into stepping down.  Not that there's any guarantee that his successor won't be another heretical usurper, but at least it sets some things into motion that might eventually lead to a restoration.

If people wake up to the fact that the Conciliar hierarchy is morally corrupt, then they might begin questioning everything else about them, including their doctrine.  It could lead to a bit of a paradigm shift with regard to the hierarchy.  When Wojtyla walked on water among conservative Catholics, no criticism would ever stick to that "saintly man".

.
Michael Matt did a 24-minute video on Oct. 22nd.
.

.
Matt has a different approach -- that we ought to be publicly behind Vigano, supportive of him, because the Vatican fears Vigano.
.
They fear him because he is forming a cohesive bloc of faithful Catholics who are ready to do something about the corruption.
.
I tend to agree more with Verrecchio, that the problem isn't primarily pederasty, rather it's doctrinal, and Vat.II is the blister that needs to be popped.

.
I misspelled Verrecchio.