Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
So, where did you get this principle again? I understand some of the other criteria as being intuitive ... no nails/nail wounds, no crucifix. But what is the essential requirement for the INRI?
.Do you know what INRI means? Do you know its history? Have you read Scripture? Where do I start?
I would not rule out the possibility that the man is in fact a Satanist.
I, for one, DON’T consider that a rash judgement.
Well, I was careful in my choice of words. I didn't say that I think he is, just that I couldn't rule it out.
Francis has not yet been judged a formal heretic by the Church, so I cannot see a reason to call him an Antipope.
It's enough to use reason and judge that he is a manifest heretic. Otherwise, you would have to follow him. If he was the vicar of Our Lord, we would have to obey him to escape sin.
Is this a public or private judgment?
I published it recently. For quite some minutes it's been public.