Author Topic: Antipope Bergoglio Carries a Stang – the Ritual Staff of Witchcraft (Read 6932 times)

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #30 on:** October 08, 2018, 10:44:53 AM »

Quote from: Ladislaus on October 08, 2018, 08:07:26 AM

So, where did you get this principle again? I understand some of the other criteria as being intuitive ... no nails/nail wounds, no crucifix. But what is the essential requirement for the INRI?

.
Do you know what INRI means? Do you know its history? Have you read Scripture? Where do I start?

Ladislaus · « **Reply #31 on:** October 09, 2018, 08:13:50 AM »

Quote from: Neil Obstat on October 08, 2018, 10:44:53 AM

.
Do you know what INRI means? Do you know its history? Have you read Scripture? Where do I start?

I obviously know what it means. I can read Latin, Greek, and Hebrew. But the question is where the requirement for a crucifix to have INRI on it in order to meet the definition of a crucifix come from ... aside from your own fertile mind?

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #32 on:** October 15, 2018, 12:03:47 AM »

.
Bishop-of-Rome Francis carries a stang, the ritual staff of witchcraft, without an INRI, obviously. Therefore...
So is it a crucifix? Doesn't the fact of the pope carrying it, as if it were a ferula, make it a crucifix?

.

https://novusordowatch.org/2018/10/stang-francis-synod-sorcerers-staff/

.

Here we must give kudos specifically to Ann Barnhardt, who was apparently the first to identify this as a stang. We have many disagreements with Miss Barnhardt but want to give credit where credit is due (cf. Rom 13:7).

One very important detail that is not to be glossed over is that the young woman who gave the stang to Francis on Aug. 11 was wearing a red wristband, another occult symbol, as shown in Barnhardt’s second post linked above.

Of course, many people will now say that we cannot assume that Francis knowingly used a Wiccan wizard’s staff for a ferula. Aside from the fact that no one in his right mind would use such a piece of sinister-looking junk in place of the Cross of Christ, it is Francis’ obligation to know what he is using. The burden rests on him to ensure he acts in accordance with the Faith at all times, not on everyone else to constantly find excuses for him.
.
Even more importantly, however, we must point out that for Francis to knowingly use a witches’ staff in the liturgy totally fits the pattern we have seen from him over the years.

Let’s review: Francis has said he has so much energy because instead of going to the doctor, he goes “to the witch” ; he has literally stated, “I am the devil” ; when receiving a Pagan sorceress at the Vatican, he allowed her to work some of her magick on him ; he has stated that his favorite exorcist is a Lutheran layman; he has received a large number of “medical” treatments by a practitioner of Taoism ; he has said that Jesus Christ “made Himself the devil” for us; he has given a manuscript of the life of Buddha as a gift to the president of Myanmar; he is on record saying that Pagans “meet God in different ways” ; he has kissed a sinister-looking crucifix with occult symbolism ; he has paid a visit to Buddhist “relics” ; decades ago he sought prolonged professional help from a Jєωιѕн psychoanalyst; he continually holds audiences before the blasphemous “Resurrection” sculpture in the Paul VI audience hall; he cracks blasphemous jokes ; and he has declared the ultimate Witchdoctor of the Novus Ordo Church, “Pope” John Paul II of Voodoo, cow dung, Koran-kissing, and Assisi interfaith prayer infamy, to be a “saint” worthy of Catholics’ veneration and imitation.

The real question, therefore, is: Why wouldn’t he use a Wiccan stang?

At this point, the Great Apostasy is so far advanced that the “Pope” can use a two-horned staff that is clearly linked to witchcraft, and except for a select few bloggers, practically nobody cares. If soon there is open Satanism being practiced in the Vatican, it will barely elicit a yawn.
.
For his next “Mass”, expect to see a pitchfork or a broomstick.

Two-thousand years ago, St. Paul asked rhetorically: “And what concord hath Christ with Belial?” (2 Cor 6:15). But then again, that was before Vatican II.
.
.
Is it a crucifix? Nobody cares. It barely elicits a yawn.
I mean, there isn't any authoritative Church docuмent or law that forbids the pope from carrying a stang, is there?
So if the pope carries a stang as a ferula, then that must make it into a crucifix, no?
Or a pitchfork or a broomstick -- wouldn't they become a crucifix too?
Who cares? It barely elicits a yawn.
.

Ladislaus · « **Reply #33 on:** October 15, 2018, 08:16:33 AM »

I would not rule out the possibility that the man is in fact a Satanist.

Recusant Sede · « **Reply #34 on:** October 15, 2018, 09:37:45 AM »

Quote from: Ladislaus on October 15, 2018, 08:16:33 AM

I would not rule out the possibility that the man is in fact a Satanist.

I, for one, DON’T consider that a rash judgement.

CathInfo.com

Author Topic: Antipope Bergoglio Carries a Stang – the Ritual Staff of Witchcraft (Read 6932 times)

Neil Obstat

Re: Antipope Bergoglio Carries a Stang – the Ritual Staff of Witchcraft

Ladislaus

Re: Antipope Bergoglio Carries a Stang – the Ritual Staff of Witchcraft

Neil Obstat

Re: Antipope Bergoglio Carries a Stang – the Ritual Staff of Witchcraft

Ladislaus

Re: Antipope Bergoglio Carries a Stang – the Ritual Staff of Witchcraft

Recusant Sede

Re: Antipope Bergoglio Carries a Stang – the Ritual Staff of Witchcraft