If you speak only of sodomites you're leaving lesbians off the hook.

Sodomy (/ˈsɒdəmi/) is generally anal or oral sex between people or sɛҳuąƖ activity between a person and a non-human animal (bestiality), but it may also mean any non-procreative sɛҳuąƖ activity.

The term Reprobate is best, otherwise why didn't St. Paul use the term sodomite in Romans 1?

In my experience, the SSPX parishioners in my chapel are naïve and couldn't identify an effeminate man even if the man was a flamer.

In Western Europe effeminacy is considered a sign of class and culture. The Western European priests couldn't spot a sodomite if his life depended on it.

There are men who have eyes to see, and hopefully there is at least one in every chapel to alert the naïve.

What are sodomites doing in a Catholic Church? It is like if I showed up every Sunday with a harem of Playboy bunnies. Why would I go to mass? I think these sodomites are there because the priests welcome them and encourage them to come. The Novus Ordo world is all about welcoming you as you are.

I would have confronted the priests from day one and have left that place after their first milquetoast response. Lot was not commanded to convert Gomorrah, but to leave it.  

[...] on the topic of what to call sɛҳuąƖ degenerates? -- but "SSA" certainly isn't it.

The thread is the first and last time I've seen the term used.  Any other term works better --

Sodomites are nothing else if not pathologically narcissistic, self-obsessed, and self-pitying. They are narcissists par excellence, taking the giving, outward-looking, life-begetting gift of naturally ordered sɛҳuąƖity, and completely inverting it, sating their appetites in a copy of themselves, in utterly selfish sterility. Is it any wonder that, when God scourged them with the AIDS epidemic, they managed to turn that opportunity for conversion and penitence into a worldwide pity party celebrating their "bravery" and even shamelessly declaring their "pride" in their perversions? Furthermore, is it any wonder that, in the post-conciliar decades, as the Church hierarchy became increasingly comprised of a network of fαɢɢօts hiding in plain sight, that "pastoral initiatives" and "outreach programs" to sodomites became so prevalent, and so visible, and so "affirming," and so "emotionally validating." One the one side, fαɢs were told they were accepted "as they are," and on the other, "SSA's" were given a cookie and a pat on the head and bright shiny gold star for not committing a capital sin that cries to heaven for vengeance. Either way, the whole thing - the whole damned public discourse about fαɢs in Catholic circles - even Traditional ones - has gotten decidedly faggy, full of the treacly false compassion and self-obsessed shamelessness of the out-of-the-closet sodomite culture that has infected the Church at the very highest levels.

To see a term like "ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ" as needed is to tacitly accept the sodomites' own premise that their inclination is their identity; an indelible "orientation" stamped upon their very soul. That's why the term was coined and, as evidenced by this thread, on a traditional Catholic forum, a century and a half after Kertbeny coined it, it has been a resounding success.

Quite frankly, there shouldn't even be a dialogue about perverts against nature anymore. It leaves open the absurdity that this disgusting, revolting behavior could be "normal". Ninety-nine percent of fαɢɢօts won't listen, anyway. They're too selfish & addicted to the perversion. What's the point of saving 1% by getting them to realize their destructive lifestyle on themselves and civilization, when more people, especially the youth, are scandalized by the dialogue that can create openness or curiosity to this reprobate behavior? All perverts against nature should be eradicated by the state. No more talk. Just kill them all now. Save souls. Save innocence. Save future lives. Save civilization.

Are you a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ?