Sorry, I had to barf first before I wrote a reply. Here goes.
where he had been serving prior to my entrance into this work in service to the ministry of Pope John Paul II
Viganò writes:
[McCarrick’s] nomination to Washington was opposed by then-Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re. At the Nunciature in Washington there is a note, written in his hand, in which Cardinal Re disassociates himself from the appointment and states that McCarrick was 14th on the list for Washington.
Louie V. responds:
In order for one to conclude that John Paul II did not know about McCarrick’s background, we must believe that the Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, Cardinal Battista Re, who most certainly knew the truth and felt very strongly that McCarrick should not receive the appointment, simply failed to inform the pope.
Like I said, absurd.
And yet, John Paul II not only went ahead with the appointment anyway, he made McCarrick a cardinal in February 2001, thus giving him a place in the conclave that would elect his successor!
Equally as absurd is the excuse that John Paul II, whose travels between 2001-2004 number no less than a dozen-and-a-half, was so “very ill” that he cannot be held accountable.
Bottom line: John Paul II knew about McCarrick and not only covered for him, he also chose to advance his ecclesial career and his prestige; even against the input of the Cardinal-Prefect for the Congregation for Bishops.