Author Topic: Syllabus of Errors 2009 (Read 1142 times)

Ecclesia Militans · « **Reply #1 on:** September 15, 2009, 09:03:12 PM »

You missed one error:

Sedevacantism is not for the birds.

Caminus · « **Reply #2 on:** September 15, 2009, 10:36:20 PM »

Raoul must go to CM's church.

CM · « **Reply #3 on:** September 16, 2009, 07:16:48 AM »

Quote from: Raoul76

5) The VII "popes" never taught heresy from the Ordinary and Universal Magisterium

Of course they didn't. For it to have the word 'universal' included, I understand it must have been held from antiquity with no dissenting opinions among the Fathers or popes.

Quote from: Raoul76

15) Whether to go to Novus Ordo, SSPX or a sedevacantist chapel is irrelevant to the faith if you believe in the Catholic Church as it was before VII

They might as well include the Greek 'Orthodox' and Old 'Catholics' in their list, while their at it.

Quote from: Raoul76

16) The Catholic faith has changed because of VII, so SSPX can bend the rules

Quote from: Raoul76

34) The sedevacantist clergy does not have the power to bind consciences, but must be passive in the absence of a Pope

If they are illegal, then this is correct, but if they are legal, then it is indeed an error. All heretics are illegal.

CM · « **Reply #4 on:** September 16, 2009, 07:17:57 AM »

Good job though, very good job.

Caminus · « **Reply #5 on:** September 16, 2009, 01:06:20 PM »

Quote

It is good enough to be a "traditional" Catholic

Herein lies a most pernicious error against faith and charity. One among many. It would be fitting though, if you were to issue this list containing so many falshoods in the form of a dogmatic decree as the Pope of your own little sect considering that it would actually formalize such deceit, making it easier for Catholics to discern wherein your malice lies.

CM · « **Reply #6 on:** September 20, 2009, 11:45:39 PM »

Quote from: Caminus just

Something along these lines, or at least this is all I gathered from it

Caminus · « **Reply #7 on:** September 21, 2009, 01:46:49 AM »

Have you went and talked to that priest yet?

CM · « **Reply #8 on:** September 21, 2009, 01:53:46 AM »

And which priest would that be?