So let's get back on topic please. This is not an FE thread, but about Salza's claims regarding the errors (and he also says "heresies") of Archbishop Lefebvre.
I listened to about the first 30 minutes. It opens with Salza insisting that he's a Traditional Catholic because he "exclusively attends the Traditional Mass". We've repeatedly discussed that simply going to the Traditional Mass does not make someone a Traditional Catholic. If the bishop of whatever diocese he's in suppresses the Tridentine Mass, as some have started to do, Salza will have to cease attending the Traditional Mass, and so then would his "Traditionalism" cease.
But toward the end of the first 30, he says that he was conditioned into believing that Archbishop Lefebvre was a champion orthodoxy, but [he came to realize] "he was not". Archbishop Lefebvre held to "many errors" and even "heresies".
So then Sungenis rightly calls him out to tell everyone what some of these are.
So Salza cites some letter by Archbishop Lefebvre where he wrote that the SSPX bishops receive their jurisdiction from the people, that this is heresy. I'd like to see the letter, first of all, but secondly, he's OBVIOUSLY speaking not about ordinary jurisdiction (that would in fact be heretical to claim) but about the extraordinary jurisdiction vis-a-vis the Sacraments, nor does he mean that the people FORMALLY bestow the jurisdiction but that they materially cause the Church to supply it. So, an example of this is that the Church commands even suspended or excommunicated priests to come to the assistance of a dying Catholic with the Sacraments if necessary. Even if the priest lacks the faculties (ordinary jurisdiction) to hear the dying Catholic's confession, he is supplied the jurisdiction due to the needs of the faithful, base on the principle salus animorum suprema lex (the salvation of souls is the highest law).
NO TRADITIONAL CATHOLIC has ever claimed that jurisdiction (whether ordinary or extraordinary) comes FORMALLY from the people, but only materially in the sense that the needs of the faithful are what prompt God and the Church to supply the jurisdiction to their priests.
Total butchery on the part of Salza.
This again puts his incompetence (due to lack of training) in Catholic theology on display. He does not even understand one of the MOST BASIC of the scholastic / Aristotelian distinctions, formal vs. material. And yet the SSPX used to promote this guy as if he were some theologian ... when it served their purposes as he was attacking the sedevacantists.