Read an Interview with Matthew, the owner of CathInfo

Author Topic: Strong words from the quiet Bishop  (Read 1789 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TheD

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 673
  • Reputation: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
Strong words from the quiet Bishop
« on: May 24, 2009, 11:22:20 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Rorate Caeli

    Offline TheD

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 673
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male


    Offline TheD

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 673
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Strong words from the quiet Bishop
    « Reply #2 on: May 24, 2009, 11:24:05 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Years of discussions
    Amidst some well-known talking points, the interview granted by Bishop Alfonso de Galarreta to District magazine Iesus Christus (one of the four bishops consecrated by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre for the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X - FSSPX / SSPX in 1988 and whose excommunication was lifted by Pope Benedict XVI last January) included the following:



    -What prospects do you see for the Fraternity of Saint Pius X in the future? An agreement with Rome? A canonical recognition?



    -[Galarreta:] No, absolutely not, whether in the immediate or in the mediate future. We specifically exclude this possibility. We know that while there is no return to Tradition on the part of Rome, any practical or canonical agreement is incompatible with the public confession and defense of the faith, and would mean our death. In the best of cases, humanly speaking, we will have several years of discussions.



    Source: Iesus Christus, monthly of the SSPX District of South America, via Radio Cristiandad Blog (whole interview in Spanish).


    Offline parentsfortruth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3821
    • Reputation: +2659/-3
    • Gender: Female
    Strong words from the quiet Bishop
    « Reply #3 on: May 25, 2009, 04:39:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I was confirmed by DeGaleretta. I will never forget his sermon that day. I have a tremendous amount of respect for him. He is probably the closest one of the four to Archbishop Lefevbre.

    It's a very confusing time. I really pray for him to keep his wits about him with all this garbage with "dialoguing with the vatican."

    It sounds like he, personally, won't sell out, even if Fellay and Williamson do.

    I've heard some conflicting info about Williamson, like that he met with the vatican before the talks between Fellay and the vatican. Anyone have any comments on that?
    Matthew 5:37

    But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.

    My Avatar is Fr. Hector Bolduc. He was a faithful parish priest in De Pere, WI,

    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7060
    • Reputation: +435/-193
    • Gender: Male
    Strong words from the quiet Bishop
    « Reply #4 on: May 25, 2009, 05:24:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Richard Williamson believes that Ratzinger is a true pope and this is troubling.  
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'


    Offline TheD

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 673
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Strong words from the quiet Bishop
    « Reply #5 on: May 25, 2009, 07:59:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I highly doubt that +Bishop Williamson would sell out!

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 22912
    • Reputation: +20061/-240
    • Gender: Male
    Strong words from the quiet Bishop
    « Reply #6 on: May 25, 2009, 09:19:37 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: parentsfortruth

    I've heard some conflicting info about Williamson, like that he met with the vatican before the talks between Fellay and the vatican. Anyone have any comments on that?


    That sounds like a classic case of a "rumor" if I ever heard one.

    Any evidence, sources, links?
    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!

    Offline parentsfortruth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3821
    • Reputation: +2659/-3
    • Gender: Female
    Strong words from the quiet Bishop
    « Reply #7 on: May 26, 2009, 10:58:44 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Matthew 5:37

    But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.

    My Avatar is Fr. Hector Bolduc. He was a faithful parish priest in De Pere, WI,


    Offline TheD

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 673
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Strong words from the quiet Bishop
    « Reply #8 on: May 26, 2009, 12:38:50 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Rome must return to Tradition!  There is no other way!

    Offline parentsfortruth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3821
    • Reputation: +2659/-3
    • Gender: Female
    Strong words from the quiet Bishop
    « Reply #9 on: May 28, 2009, 10:26:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Bump!
    Matthew 5:37

    But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.

    My Avatar is Fr. Hector Bolduc. He was a faithful parish priest in De Pere, WI,

    Offline Kephapaulos

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1565
    • Reputation: +370/-5
    • Gender: Male
    Strong words from the quiet Bishop
    « Reply #10 on: May 28, 2009, 10:52:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Obviously, looking through the lenses of sedevacantism and conclavism makes it all hopeless. The SSPX position is a balanced approach to the crisis in the Church. We can argue all year about what I just said, but I still say that Abp. Lefebvre chose the right men to be consecrated bishops.
    "Non nobis, Domine, non nobis; sed nomini tuo da gloriam..." (Ps. 113:9)


    Offline parentsfortruth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3821
    • Reputation: +2659/-3
    • Gender: Female
    Strong words from the quiet Bishop
    « Reply #11 on: May 29, 2009, 10:37:08 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I am not sede vacant if that was directed towards me. I was just wondering if anyone could confirm or deny what happened during that secret contact with Rome last year.
    Matthew 5:37

    But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.

    My Avatar is Fr. Hector Bolduc. He was a faithful parish priest in De Pere, WI,

    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4814
    • Reputation: +2007/-4
    • Gender: Male
    Strong words from the quiet Bishop
    « Reply #12 on: June 10, 2009, 09:42:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Huh?  You are not sedevacantist, pft?  

    Tres decevant!  

    All this junk about "reconciliation" with the Vatican is a red herring.  By saying "una cum" they are already reconciled and if you go to SSPX you are implicitly denying the infallibility of the Church.  Not only that but you are sticking a dagger right through the heart of the resistance, because you want to be comfortable.  That is the main sin.

    SSPX plays on your fear, it makes you feel safe taking the middle course.  It says "You don't have to be lonely like those paranoid sedevacantists.  Go ahead, have 20 children and bring them up in our Jansenist compound.  Meanwhile we'll be denying dogmas left and right in your name."

    You are so not safe that it is not even funny.  You are part of an illogical third order that makes up its own rules as it goes along.  If you are a sedevacantist however you are upholding infallibility and indefectibility, and you are consistent and whole of mind and purpose, as the Catholic Church always has been.  I'll pray that everyone on this site realizes it.  

    YOU
    HAVE
    NO
    SAFETY
    IN
    NUMBERS
    As I was a new convert when posting here, my posts are often full of error, even unwitting heresy and rash judgment, all of which I renounce, and all my writings are best avoided -- MDLS

    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4814
    • Reputation: +2007/-4
    • Gender: Male
    Strong words from the quiet Bishop
    « Reply #13 on: June 10, 2009, 09:59:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yes, "Jean de Morgon" is lying, parentsfortruth.  

    You are in a hall of mirrors.  You cannot get out by analyzing your reflection in each one.  You have to break them all.  It is a Hegelian maze full of false heroes and villains.  When you read a statement like that, analyze it, break it down, ask yourself "What is this statement trying to make me think?"  You are being drawn into a counterfeit reality.

    For instance, in the above statement by Jean de Morgon, there is the usual lie that Lefebvre was a great conservative and that SSPX has somehow fallen from his glorious height.  The SSPX loves to mythologize Lefebvre.  People have now unconsciously started to go along with this, so that now you will hear SSPXers lamenting about how they need to "get back" to Lefebvre's tough stance.  Pretty soon there will be statues of him everywhere and you will need to kiss his feet before entering your SSPX third-order "church."

    Actually Fellay and Lefebvre are two peas in a pod.  They both have the same technique -- win peoples' trust by saying conservative things, and then shiv them in the back.  Some people call this "wavering," but it is actually deliberate mind-control technique.  They use it in the media and in the government as well, changing the truth day by day, keeping you unsteady.  It is meant to demoralize you and make you feel helpless and eventually apathetic.

    The difference between Vatican II and SSPX is like the difference between Democrats and Republicans.  Is that extreme?  Maybe only a wee bit.
    As I was a new convert when posting here, my posts are often full of error, even unwitting heresy and rash judgment, all of which I renounce, and all my writings are best avoided -- MDLS

    Offline CM

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2726
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    Strong words from the quiet Bishop
    « Reply #14 on: June 10, 2009, 10:19:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • What do SSPX, Vatican II, Democrats and Republicans all have in common?

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16