For cryin' out loud Angelus just read closer and not read looking to see if it's capable of supporting what you want it to say.
For example, look at this canon:
According to that, no pope could make any change in any rite used in administration of the sacraments - rites (plural), sacraments (plural). That would forbid Pius XII, for example, in making any changes in the rite regarding the sacrament of ordination. Your reading is nonsense. As Pius XII himself said:
The proscription against changing is directed at rogue priests and perhaps bishops who change sacramental rites at their own discretion and without approval of the authority authorized to make changes - which is Rome, or the pope, sometimes the local ordinary with delegated authority.
Pius XII made this clear in Mediator Dei. The proscriptions of change relate to lesser authorities that act without approval of the competent authorities and wreak havoc and inconsistencies with regard to administration of the holy sacraments:
Again, with all your other highlights of Magisterial texts, you stretch them to the point of abuse to read into them what you want. None of those texts say the competent authority of the Church, the holy father the pope, can't change the Canon or any other rites of the Roman Church in reference to the administration of the sacraments other than those, by divine law and the Lord Himself, aspects (the Form) which have been determined in specie, e.g., the words of the consecration of the precious body and blood in the Eucharist.
You highlight "the Sacred Canon, pure from any error." Right. The TLM canon is pure and free from error. That doesn't say the pope can't change in the prayers of the Canon or any parts of a sacramental rite " what things soever it may judge most expedient, for the profit of those who receive, or for the veneration of the said sacraments, according to the difference of circuмstances, times, and places." Council of Trent, Session XXI, Chapter 2.
You highlight, " especially to be vigilant that the sacred rites and ceremonies are diligently observed," and " in matters affecting sacred rites and ceremonies, and shall take
care lest these fall into abuse." Of course. We are talking about the sacraments, and diligence and care should be taken as to their administration lest, again, their administration otherwise falls into havoc and inconsistencies and even conflict by private and peculiar use by priests, etc. - but, AGAIN, that language doesn't bear the weight you want to lay on it. It doesn't mean the pope or the Church, the proper authority, can't make changes to the sacramental rites as it sees fit.
It's as if you read these things until you find something that you think can support your argument, and then you stretch the text around your argument.
Sorry . . . your rubber bands are broken.
Dear DecemRationis,
You are right that Canon 13 of the VII-th Session of Trent forbids any changes to the rites of Sacraments. Pope Pius XII did not introduce any changes to the Sacrament of Order; he just defined the text necessary for the validity of the Roman Rite of ordination to diaconate, priesthood, and episcopacy. He also established that it is the imposition of hands of a bishop that is the matter of the Sacrament of Order. Confirming Trent and the teaching of his predecessors, he ordered that the whole rite be scrupulously adhered to; nothing omitted or added.
The reference to the possibility of the Church to abrogate or change what She established refers to the previously held position that the matter of the Sacrament of Order is the "Traditio Instrumentorum" as expounded by "Decretum pro Armenis". The "Traditio Instrumentorum" is still kept in the Roman Rite. By the way, Canon 13 of the Seventh Session binds the popes also, not only the bishops and priests. Be careful with translations of the word, "quemcuмque". It means whosoever; not every, or any.