Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: SSPX Statistics 2025  (Read 15566 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SSPX Statistics 2025
« on: January 16, 2026, 12:27:17 PM »
Interesting to see which countries the SSPX focuses on.

https://fsspx.news/en/news/sspx-statistics-2025-56151

Re: SSPX Statistics 2025
« Reply #1 on: January 16, 2026, 04:23:02 PM »
Are we supposed to be surprised or shocked? The Society was started in France by a French speaking Archbishop. The USA is where the money is at.  Both countries have lots of Catholics.  


Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: SSPX Statistics 2025
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2026, 04:23:29 PM »
And none of these stats, not the number of countries, or the # of chapels, or the # of priests gives the SSPX *one ounce more* of legitimacy compared with some independent Traditional priest saying Mass for 10 people in a hotel room.
Both operate under supplied jurisdiction, neither is canonically regular.

Fundamentally, the SSPX is in the same status as ANY independent Traditional Catholic lifeboat chapel.

But of course the SSPX has much more impressive "stats" which has only served to go RIGHT to their head, inflating their egos massively about their own perceived greatness and importance.
In the end, they got so high on their own farts they started to choose "the good of the SSPX" as a primary good, and "the good of souls" as a secondary "nice to have" goal.

Interesting tidbit -- this was ALWAYS the Achilles' Heel of the SSPX. Even in the 1980's. Yes, even when they were good, and worthy of support. My old priest (Fr. Frank Slupski) as well as Thomas A. Nelson didn't spend a lot of time bashing the SSPX (next to no time, actually) but they DID speak the truth that "sometimes, the SSPX thinks they're the Church!" and I completely understand what they meant now. It's not that the SSPX wasn't part of the Church -- because they were. But they thought they WERE the Church. As in, "Outside the SSPX there is no salvation". That was definitely in the air you breathe in many SSPX circles. This came to a head in 2012 (the rot was there, and came to fruition on a given date -- just like Vatican II) but the tendency to self-complacency was there from the 1980's. I find that interesting.

Re: SSPX Statistics 2025
« Reply #3 on: January 16, 2026, 04:47:55 PM »
And none of these stats, not the number of countries, or the # of chapels, or the # of priests gives the SSPX *one ounce more* of legitimacy compared with some independent Traditional priest saying Mass for 10 people in a hotel room.
Both operate under supplied jurisdiction, neither is canonically regular.

Fundamentally, the SSPX is in the same status as ANY independent Traditional Catholic lifeboat chapel.

But of course the SSPX has much more impressive "stats" which has only served to go RIGHT to their head, inflating their egos massively about their own perceived greatness and importance.
In the end, they got so high on their own farts they started to choose "the good of the SSPX" as a primary good, and "the good of souls" as a secondary "nice to have" goal.

Interesting tidbit -- this was ALWAYS the Achilles' Heel of the SSPX. Even in the 1980's. Yes, even when they were good, and worthy of support. My old priest (Fr. Frank Slupski) as well as Thomas A. Nelson didn't spend a lot of time bashing the SSPX (next to no time, actually) but they DID speak the truth that "sometimes, the SSPX thinks they're the Church!" and I completely understand what they meant now. It's not that the SSPX wasn't part of the Church -- because they were. But they thought they WERE the Church. As in, "Outside the SSPX there is no salvation". That was definitely in the air you breathe in many SSPX circles. This came to a head in 2012 (the rot was there, and came to fruition on a given date -- just like Vatican II) but the tendency to self-complacency was there from the 1980's. I find that interesting.
Given how luxurious was the food that was eaten by the priests I was with, some some exception, there is an odour of truth in this statement. 
Anytime I hear the statement "we are the church" in relation especially to the neosspx, the song by US artists "We are the world" - self indulgent crapulence - done for Africa aid, comes to mind.:facepalm:

Re: SSPX Statistics 2025
« Reply #4 on: January 16, 2026, 10:38:07 PM »
Are we supposed to be surprised or shocked? The Society was started in France by a French speaking Archbishop. The USA is where the money is at.  Both countries have lots of Catholics. 
Why the down vote? The statistics are what they are. I don’t state my approval or disapproval. There is no critique of the SSPX. I simply sum up the statistics. They point mainly to France and the USA. 
Assuming the statistics are true, downvoting me is like giving me a downvote for saying 62 + 21 = 83. There’s no shock or surprise at the sum of 83!  There’s nothing with which to disagree!   If you don’t like the answer, that does not change the fact of the matter!  
Perhaps you were expecting people would dislike the entire math problem?  Maybe they prefer  62 + 21 = 74?  They might prefer it, but 74 is incorrect!  

To use a worn out phrase, “It is what it is.”