CathInfo.com

Others are saying this deliberate contortion of Our Lady’s request is an insult, ...

Those are the very sentiments I posted a few days ago.

Also, the intention of the consecration was to make repration for blasphemies against Our Blessed Mother, not to "stop Russia's invasion of Ukraine".  Russia was merely the instrument of God's chastisment of the world.  So given that Bergoglio is one of the blasphemers in chief (of Our Blessed Mother), I expect some very dire things to take place on Friday.

https://novusordowatch.org/2019/12/bergoglio-blasphemes-the-immaculate/

That one blasphemy in particular is hard for me to read without getting sick to my stomach, where he basically characterizes Our Lady as shaking her fist at God and calling Him a liar.  He claims that she too expected a temporal Messiah (like the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan) who would sit on the throne of David and rule, and called God a liar when she saw Him crucified.  As if Our Blessed Mother didn't understand perfectly His mission.  What a faithless apostate scuм this man is.  I have no words for how disgusting his blasphemy is.  THIS MAN will make reparation for blasphemies against Our Blessed Mother?

It says that the request of Our Lady was for "in union with all the bishops".  Antecedent of "which called for" is "the request of Our Lady".  And the SSPX say that the message is being "taken into account".  So it does seem to imply by "taken into account" that it's not entirely being conformed to.

Nevertheless, they (believing Bergoglio to be the pope) should have called this out and insisted that "Pope" Francis make sure that it does comply with Our Lady's requests.

This sounds like they're kissing up to Bergoglio and fawning all over him.

Bergolio is the best thing to happen to the neo-SSPX ever.

Our Lady did not request the consecration of Ukraine at Fatima, and therefore, Francis is not complying with her request.

Why is the SSPX pretending he is?

Father's opinion today was that because he is specifically stating the intent to consecrate Russia, that the addition of Ukraine is irrelevant to the validity of the consecration.

I don't necessarily agree, but, this appears to be the mindset of the SSPX.