Are you the "genuine" Erica Kauffman?  There are lots of imposter accounts out there.  That's why Donald Tɾυmρ had to adopt realDonalTɾυmρ on Twitter, because someone else snatched up the regular name.

If so, the last I heard was that the SSPX concluded that your relationship with Fr. Arzuaga was consensual.

I am she, but you are anonymous. I heard that bazaar theory, also but the further videos prove with docuмentation that it is a lie. I should have been included in any and all investigations to see the evidence, according to Canon Law. I was not included.

But your rule is that the video must be watched, and that you won't address anything that has already been covered in your video. With the strict restrictions you've imposed, you can't really clear up any confusion that we might have.

So I can't see that the reason you've given for joining this forum makes sense.

To clarify any confusion after having watched the videos. I'm not going to waste my time on people who won't make an investment of their own time. 
I have gone public for ONE REASON: to warn people of a predator and a criminal cover-up by the SSPX. 

To clarify any confusion after having watched the videos. I'm not going to waste my time on people who won't make an investment of their own time.
I have gone public for ONE REASON: to warn people of a predator and a criminal cover-up by the SSPX.

But you won't address anything that's already been addressed in the video. So I will repeat: you won't really be able to clear up any confusion with your restrictive rules of engagement.

I watched your video that was posted in the original Remnant article. I won't watch it again, because I'm not into emotional Jerry Springer-type confessions. Are we always to believe the victim, if only the victim is emotional enough in their presentation? You see, we've only heard one side of the story. You appear to want everyone to assume that Fr. Arzuaga is absolutely guilty. But it would not be fair to assume this, given that only one side is presented. This isn't a court of law. It's just a forum.

It's not that we don't believe that the SSPX or SSPX priests are incapable of wrongdoing. Not at all. Most of us here are quite critical of the leadership of the SSPX, in the direction that they have gone towards Modernist Rome. However, we want to understand both sides of the story. You believe that's wrong?

I never said that. I am willing to clarify what I can. I have uploaded two short videos to explain much more. And if my agony is too much for you, get over yourself.

Good heavens.   You want to force everyone to watch your videos. No thanks. That's why your here. 

Then why are you folks even discussing it? And why are you so willing to trash me, mock me, etc? I've been trying to get this into court since Wegner was DS. He offered me a settlement. I refused because of the strings attached. Meg, I don't have a clue who you are, yet I am here and on YouTube totally transparent.

I thought you said in your original video that you can't afford to go to court.

Yeah ... with that gun I'm pointing at you.  

I don't get it.  

There are ways to get it done with no cost to me, but it is a fluid situation and THAT I won't reveal. At the time of the video, it was true that I would have had to come up with many thousands of dollars. Besides, the SSPX won't bring Arzuaga here to face me in court.

But you said in in your recent post that you've been trying to get this into court since Wegner was DS. That conflicts with your statement in your video that you can't afford to go to court.