Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: SSPX Scandal from the Remnant.  (Read 34021 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TKGS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5839
  • Reputation: +4687/-489
  • Gender: Male
Re: SSPX Scandal from the Remnant.
« Reply #75 on: November 24, 2020, 02:00:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The heart of the problem here is that she has nothing to lose by making a false accusation.
    And, as Bill Cosby has found out, women can find false accusations to be very profitable.

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 11970
    • Reputation: +7517/-2254
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX Scandal from the Remnant.
    « Reply #76 on: November 24, 2020, 03:16:06 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • Quote
    The problem is that the SSPX appears to be stonewalling now, which tends to give credence to her charge that they stonewalled then.

    The sspx has no authority and no training to investigate crimes.  If the lady wants justice, she should go to the cops, and the sspx will cooperate with them, if the story holds water.  The lady is barking up the wrong tree.
    .
    The only reason the Vatican can investigate their own, is because they are a separate country with their own laws and police.  This doesn't apply to the sspx.


    Offline Erica Kauffman

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 56
    • Reputation: +52/-48
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX Scandal from the Remnant.
    « Reply #77 on: June 15, 2021, 09:25:19 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!2
  • https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/headline-news-around-the-world/item/5152-looking-for-answers-sspx-priest-accused

    I didn't see a thread on this. A woman accuses an SSPX priest of ɾαριɳg her in the 90's. She says she bore the priest's child. And accuses the SSPX of covering it up back then and still now. This is the Remnant, not homo Voris.
    Well, in my on going investigations I stumbled upon this thread. Wow. Just. Wow. Here I am: have at it but I won't respond to topics covered in the videos; I won't respond to anonymous posters (you can email me if you like); and I will only respond to the same question once, so pay attention to what other's have asked and what I have said.  
    Here is my YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpxX5o-7DxqS3xmYPRcb3nQ

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 11970
    • Reputation: +7517/-2254
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX Scandal from the Remnant.
    « Reply #78 on: June 15, 2021, 09:31:55 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Why did you create a YT channel?  What's the purpose?

    Offline Erica Kauffman

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 56
    • Reputation: +52/-48
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX Scandal from the Remnant.
    « Reply #79 on: June 15, 2021, 09:40:07 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • Why did you create a YT channel?  What's the purpose?
    Don't worry, it isn't monetized. I had it for years to post various things and then I decided to go public regarding my story and now everything is all in one place. Simple concept.


    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 11970
    • Reputation: +7517/-2254
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX Scandal from the Remnant.
    « Reply #80 on: June 15, 2021, 09:49:01 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!2
  • Have you talked to the police?  Doesn't posting your story on YT compromise you, legally? 

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6790
    • Reputation: +3467/-2999
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX Scandal from the Remnant.
    « Reply #81 on: June 15, 2021, 09:51:32 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Well, in my on going investigations I stumbled upon this thread. Wow. Just. Wow. Here I am: have at it but I won't respond to topics covered in the videos; I won't respond to αnσnymσus posters (you can email me if you like); and I will only respond to the same question once, so pay attention to what other's have asked and what I have said.  
    Here is my YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpxX5o-7DxqS3xmYPRcb3nQ

    How did you find out about this forum?
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29

    Offline Mr G

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2360
    • Reputation: +1527/-91
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX Scandal from the Remnant.
    « Reply #82 on: June 15, 2021, 09:53:28 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • Have you talked to the police?  Doesn't posting your story on YT compromise you, legally?
    I believe that was covered in the video.


    Offline Erica Kauffman

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 56
    • Reputation: +52/-48
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX Scandal from the Remnant.
    « Reply #83 on: June 15, 2021, 09:57:40 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • Have you talked to the police?  Doesn't posting your story on YT compromise you, legally?
    Okay, Mr. Pax Vobis who did not understand that I don't know who you are and those questions are addressed in the videos, go watch the videos.

    Offline Erica Kauffman

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 56
    • Reputation: +52/-48
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX Scandal from the Remnant.
    « Reply #84 on: June 15, 2021, 10:00:15 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • How did you find out about this forum?
    Google.

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6790
    • Reputation: +3467/-2999
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX Scandal from the Remnant.
    « Reply #85 on: June 15, 2021, 10:01:06 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Google.

    Thank you. Why did you join this forum?
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29


    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 11970
    • Reputation: +7517/-2254
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX Scandal from the Remnant.
    « Reply #86 on: June 15, 2021, 10:01:35 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • Quote
    I don't know who you are and those questions are addressed in the videos

    ?? You're complaining that you don't know who I am, but you post videos on a public website, for all the world to see?

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46205
    • Reputation: +27185/-5029
    • Gender: Male
    Re: SSPX Scandal from the Remnant.
    « Reply #87 on: June 15, 2021, 10:06:17 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • Don't worry, it isn't monetized. I had it for years to post various things and then I decided to go public regarding my story and now everything is all in one place. Simple concept.

    Are you the "genuine" Erica Kauffman?  There are lots of imposter accounts out there.  That's why Donald Trump had to adopt realDonalTrump on Twitter, because someone else snatched up the regular name.

    If so, the last I heard was that the SSPX concluded that your relationship with Fr. Arzuaga was consensual.

    Offline Erica Kauffman

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 56
    • Reputation: +52/-48
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX Scandal from the Remnant.
    « Reply #88 on: June 15, 2021, 10:10:29 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • Thank you. Why did you join this forum?
    To answer some confusion that I will be happy to do after the video is watched and members simply commented on the video or emailed me directly.

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6790
    • Reputation: +3467/-2999
    • Gender: Female
    Re: SSPX Scandal from the Remnant.
    « Reply #89 on: June 15, 2021, 10:13:14 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • To answer some confusion that I will be happy to do after the video is watched and members simply commented on the video or emailed me directly.

    But your rule is that the video must be watched, and that you won't address anything that has already been covered in your video. With the strict restrictions you've imposed, you can't really clear up any confusion that we might have.

    So I can't see that the reason you've given for joining this forum makes sense. 
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29