Not to beat a dead horse, Bonaventure, but why did you leave out the last phrase?   Which is, in my Webster's --  also: such an opportunity.  Cathinfo was that opportunity.

I repeat - this thread should be closed.

P.S.- One thing I've never understood is how these girls/women do not have anyone to go to. If my sister had trouble with any man she works with, she would send for me and I would take care of it before it went to the point of rape.

Not every woman has a supportive family or a male protector.  For example, right now, I’m very much on my own.  I’m geographically isolated, and if I weren’t, I have no male family members to turn to.  I’d have to rely on the police who won’t act unless a law is actually broken.  Are the cops really going to help if I report that a man gave me unwholesome looks or said something a bit off-color?  
That is why I keep three large dogs and a firearm.  
I can’t imagine needing the last mentioned after they set upon the evil intending priest.  Rather, I imagine him fleeing down the lane with his cassock in shreds.

Not to beat a dead horse, Bonaventure, but why did you leave out the last phrase?   Which is, in my Webster's --  also: such an opportunity.  Cathinfo was that opportunity.

I repeat - this thread should be closed.

Agreed 100%.  
This whole thread reads like a trashy tabloid at the supermarket.  
Erika--if this is really you, and not some imposter--face the reality.  This is what you're dealing with in Trad circles.  People who take the time to watch your entire video and then discuss it, really think what the sample population here think.  There are mixed opinions--probably mostly those of disbelief, and you are not going to change anybody's made-up mind online.  Whether you like it or not, it is what it is.

The Catholic Church is in crisis because of fornication and sơdơmy.

95% of this stuff happens because the Church has been infiltrated by communists/freemasons and they want to destroy the Church.  They use scandal, deviancy and perversion as one of their methods.  This is not normal behavior; it is a weapon.

+

This will be my final words on this thread and probably the board, which I stumbled on after Googling my name. For those of you who have responded charitably and objectively (pro or con), I thank you for being good examples of Catholics for everyone.

Firstly, I did not come forward with what happened to me in order to get some kind of 'street justice'. My case is in the Hands of a Divine Tribunal and I am very okay with that. I wanted SSPX faithful to know that there is a predator and hirelings within who won't protect you and your children, so DO IT FOR YOURSELVES. Learn from my mistakes.

Secondly, I or any other victim who comes forward, stand NOTHING to gain and EVERYTHING to lose by doing so, as evidenced by this existing 7-8 page thread, which I had no idea existed until a few weeks ago. After you all became aware of my video testimony from the Remnant did even one of you reach out to me privately with your concerns/objections before venting your spleens and shredding me to pieces HERE? Doubtfully, because in such a case the victim is presumed guilty while the accused is presumed innocent.

Thirdly, in the videos, which so many refuse to watch but feel expertly capable of commenting on, you will find a detailed time-line, docuмents and logical arguments to support my claims. No one is obligated to watch any or all videos, but if you don't you lose the prerogative to comment on the topic.

Lastly, and most importantly, I turned to the SSPX authorities first. I went directly to Fellay as confirmed by his First Assistant, Pfluger. The prior and assistant priest (Stanich and Hewko, respectively) had knowledge of what Arzuaga was doing to me and failed to help. If it was a mutual, consensual relationship, then Stanich was obligated to fire me immediately because of the morality clause in my teaching contract. He did not. Ask him why he failed so miserably to do his job. I further pursued keeping Fellay in the loop via written correspondence to which he replied even years after the fact in my favor. I spoke to and met with various District Superiors over the course of TWENTY-THREE years before going public to avoid causing the actions of one bad priest to tarnish the good work of the SSPX.

There you have it. Take it or leave it. Call me 'Jezabel' and send in the rabid dogs.

Nobody’s defending Arzuaga’s sacrilegious fornication.  What’s at issue is whether he committed a sin (consensual fornication against his vows with a grown woman) or a crime (rape).  You’re setting up a false dilemma and deliberately mischaracterizing the debate out of your animosity against the SSPX.  I don’t like the SSPX, but I’m not going to lose objectivity over it.  There’s no evidence that this was not consensual.  This happens all the time in the secular world, where a woman shows no outward sign of resisting a man’s advances and then later alleges rape.

As for the SSPX, they did take some action against Arzuaga and didn’t cover up anything.  You could argue that the action they took wasn’t severe enough, and I would concur, but that’s not the same as a coverup ... which is the chief concern here.

I find no credible evidence of rape or if coverup, but only of consensual sacrilegious fornication and too light a punishment.

Frankly, it is better for the world if EVERYONE thought and acted like Ladislaus (in the quote above), and a few "rapists" got off the hook,
rather than everyone acting out of knee-jerk emotion and "my group your group" bias, and "accidentally" nailed an actual perpetrator despite lack of evidence.

In other words, I'd rather be WRONG for the right reason (rationality, fairness, logic), than RIGHT for the wrong reason (by accident, or due to emotion, jingoism, team politics).

EK: Firstly, I did not come forward with what happened to me in order to get some kind of 'street justice'. My case is in the Hands of a Divine Tribunal and I am very okay with that. I wanted SSPX faithful to know that there is a predator and hirelings within who won't protect you and your children, so DO IT FOR YOURSELVES. Learn from my mistakes.

Secondly, I or any other victim who comes forward, stand NOTHING to gain and EVERYTHING to lose by doing so, as evidenced by this existing 7-8 page thread, which I had no idea existed until a few weeks ago. After you all became aware of my video testimony from the Remnant did even one of you reach out to me privately with your concerns/objections before venting your spleens and shredding me to pieces HERE? Doubtfully, because in such a case the victim is presumed guilty while the accused is presumed innocent.

Erika, I don't wish to be associated with people "who are shredding you to pieces."  In fact, I may be the one on CI earlier who brought your tragic case to light. My wife and I stand with you against these sspx priest predators. (There are far more than one)  Furthermore, we support you in all the actions you have attempted against the "hirelings" who run the whole show.  It's a coverup from day one.  That's the modus operandi of the sspx hierarchy in most, if not all, such cases.  We are convinced that the SSPX is a Catholic cult, or was turned into one after the passage of years.
BTW, anyone, what is the latest news on Fr. Arzuaga?  Where is he?  Is he still a priest with the Society?

Erika, I don't wish to be associated with people "who are shredding you to pieces."  In fact, I may be the one on CI earlier who brought your tragic case to light. My wife and I stand with you against these sspx priest predators. (There are far more than one)  Furthermore, we support you in all the actions you have attempted against the "hirelings" who run the whole show.  It's a coverup from day one.  That's the modus operandi of the sspx hierarchy in most, if not all, such cases.  We are convinced that the SSPX is a Catholic cult, or was turned into one after the passage of years.
BTW, anyone, what is the latest news on Fr. Arzuaga?  Where is he?  Is he still a priest with the Society?

Right, I'll vouch for the fact that there's no accusation against the SSPX that hollingsworth won't believe, with or without any actual evidence.  So carry on.