Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: SSPX Resistance for Dummies  (Read 306 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SanskritCrayon

SSPX Resistance for Dummies
« on: May 05, 2026, 08:09:00 PM »
I made a paper called "the SSPX Resistance Argument for Dummies", detailing briefly in timeline form how the SSPX gradually made more and more compromises. The knowledge used for this paper comes from my reading of the book "As we are" by Sean Johnson. I haven't edited the paper yet, as I just finished it. I would like to find the most experienced, balanced, and impartial man possible to finish up the details of this paper while not making it too long. I can only post it through Google Docs, so if you want to edit it, then you will have to message me first for privacy's sake.
Logged

Offline Twice dyed

  • Supporter
Re: SSPX Resistance for Dummies
« Reply #1 on: May 05, 2026, 09:21:55 PM »
  Hi!  You have a good idea. I want to make a French paper too...if ...
I will suggest using neo-SSPX in your title., or similar... SSPX is a registered name. You might notice that the 'resistance' faithful still distinguish the SSPX as the "OLD", pre 2012 position, vs. the neoSSPX, lead by +F mostly, which is the institution seeking recognition from the Vatican. Many "resistants" assist at the neoSSPX, hoping that it finds its way back to the "Good 'ole SSPX.

  I bring this up because these upcoming consecrations are providing a huge opportunity for the neoSSPX to make known worldwide its Seminaries, Churches ( Many huge btw.), schools, pilgrimages, missions.  "They are making waves", would be an understatement.
Already there are hundreds of websites buzzing about the Exco, schism?. It will absolutely get frantic the sooner July 1 approaches.
Actually, we can't comprehend the implications: as Fr. Chazal said, the SSPX is big, it's really huge.

  So you publish a paper when the newSSPX is in its glory, in the spotlight, and they find out you are exposing their compromises etc, they might act forcefully, because they deride that term SSPX Resistance. CI users are still discussing what is the 'Resistance' really means anyway.
Adios.

Pope St.Pius V,  pray for us.+

Search Assist
Yes, the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) holds copyright over its content, which includes text, graphics, and multimedia on its websites. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this content is strictly forbidden.

Logged

Offline SanskritCrayon

Re: SSPX Resistance for Dummies
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2026, 09:32:38 PM »
Quote from: Twice dyed on May 05, 2026, 09:21:55 PM
  Hi!  You have a good idea. I want to make a French paper too...if ...
I will suggest using neo-SSPX in your title., or similar... SSPX is a registered name. You might notice that the 'resistance' faithful still distinguish the SSPX as the "OLD", pre 2012 position, vs. the neoSSPX, lead by +F mostly, which is the institution seeking recognition from the Vatican. Many "resistants" assist at the neoSSPX, hoping that it finds its way back to the "Good 'ole SSPX.

  I bring this up because these upcoming consecrations are providing a huge opportunity for the neoSSPX to make known worldwide its Seminaries, Churches ( Many huge btw.), schools, pilgrimages, missions.  "They are making waves", would be an understatement.
Already there are hundreds of websites buzzing about the Exco, schism?. It will absolutely get frantic the sooner July 1 approaches.
Actually, we can't comprehend the implications: as Fr. Chazal said, the SSPX is big, it's really huge.

  So you publish a paper when the newSSPX is in its glory, in the spotlight, and they find out you are exposing their compromises etc, they might act forcefully, because they deride that term SSPX Resistance. CI users are still discussing what is the 'Resistance' really means anyway.
Adios.

Pope St.Pius V,  pray for us.+

Search Assist
Yes, the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) holds copyright over its content, which includes text, graphics, and multimedia on its websites. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this content is strictly forbidden.
The paper is not intended for public publication; it will be used to send to people when they wonder what is wrong with the new SSPX. Also, the "search assist" thing you put here (which appears to me to be copy and pasted from an AI search engine, maybe it isn't though?) does not necessarily imply that the term SSPX itself is copyrighted. Besides, the term is meant to be put next to another term to create something new. The term neo-SSPX still has the term "SSPX" in it, which is in like manner to how I used the term. But, if I did decide to make it public, I would go ahead and change the name.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »