Author Topic: SSPX Attempt To Save Templars (Read 874 times)

roscoe · « **on:** October 05, 2010, 06:15:27 PM »

A new book put out by SSPX is attempting to rehabilitate Templars. Maybe someone can read it and see how the 8 Bulls of Clement V( which have never been recinded as far as i know) are disposed of

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2010/10/sspx-joins-crusade-to-rehabilitate.html

roscoe · « **Reply #1 on:** October 07, 2010, 02:13:33 PM »

All the SSPX'ers around here and no one wants to comment? Why am I not surprised. Ciao

Belloc · « **Reply #2 on:** October 07, 2010, 02:22:45 PM »

Short reply-no proof, no logical discussion of merits or lack of by you and as you slam our forum host, let me just end with a quick comment:
you are still on hide for me, though had to look at your posts this time as am curious on this epic of history and you are still a druggie :headbanger: :smoke-pot: :smoke-pot: :dancing:

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #3 on:** October 07, 2010, 02:53:07 PM »

Belloc, the best thing we can do for roscoe is to pray for him. He believes everyone on this forum but himself is a Jansenist and continues to listen to the Beatles even though we have told him their music is satanic. Not to mention he said he could accuse me of worshipping Satan just because I think Benedict XVI is true Pope. He seems to have way too much pride.

roscoe · « **Reply #4 on:** October 07, 2010, 03:11:17 PM »

It is the anti-pope Benedict and his anti-church who have proclaimed the hippy( 'beginning with Revolver') Beatles to be orthodox-- not moi.

When John Lennon makes a baphomet sign( 3yrs after the Beatles are a spent musical force and after a lobotomy and 100 acid trips) he is called a satanist but when the anti-pope Benedict does it he is somehow the pope of Catholic Church

I am not defending the things John said( although he did apologise) as I said quite a few nasty things about Holy Church b4 my conversion as well, but at least he didn't claim to be the Pope!!!-- U guys are hypocrats

roscoe · « **Reply #5 on:** October 07, 2010, 03:15:17 PM »

btw-- despite rumors spread by A Goldman( which are apparently taken as gospel by some) John was not a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ. It is also a lie that he partook in a ritual sacrifice to devil. Believe at your own risk.

roscoe · « **Reply #6 on:** October 07, 2010, 03:23:19 PM »

btw Belloc-- I do not have U on IG

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #7 on:** October 07, 2010, 03:24:50 PM »

No one here, to my knowledge, claimed Lennon was gαy (although in one of his pictures he was in a gαy pose) but he was a Satan worshipper. Even if he wasn't he was for sure an anti-Christian. I guess you could not care less. By the way, I'm pretty sure "hypocrats" isn't an actual word.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #8 on:** October 07, 2010, 03:33:30 PM »

I don't know what to make of the Templars, but the claims of being "exonerated" based on a "newly found" docuмent didn't seem legit to me.

They seemed to have done a lot of mischief and were incredibly rich. And there is an incredible pro-Templar bias among historians which can only be explained in its fervor by anti-clericalism.