CathInfo.com

Bishop Santay came and conferred confirmation at our chapel during Catechism week in July of 2010, and he flew. I know this because our Priest at the time went and picked him up at the airport.

Why are you taking one incident of Bishop Santay possibly traveling by car to administer Confirmation throughout the U.S., declaring his reason for doing so was because he doesn't like the TSA scanners, basing that assumption on something your mother told you that Fr. Jenkins told her, and then somehow extrapolating that into the CSPV as a whole not caring enough for their faithful?

Then, even if it's correct that Bishop Santay traveled by car on this Confirmation tour, how does that translate into the CSPV in general, or Bishop Santay in particular, not caring for the needs of the faithful? Doesn't the fact (which I don't even know to for sure be a fact) that Bishop Santay was willing to drive all over our big country to administer Confirmation show his solicitude for the spiritual welfare of the CSPV faithful?

If he just said "it's morally impossible for me to fly right now because of the intrusive TSA scanners, therefore I am impeded from traveling to administer Confirmation in our chapels", you might have a point. But you admit this is not what he did. According to your own allegation he got in a vehicle and drove all over the country to administer Confirmation. Yet you say this somehow shows the Bishop's personal, or the CSPV's in general, lack of care for their faithful? How does that follow?

You now seem to be limiting this allegation to Bishop Santay personally, which I have just shown is absurd, even accepting for the sake of argument that this recollection of your mother's that she heard from Fr. Jenkins is even accurate.

But yet you say in your previous post "to neglect the faithful as a result of refusing to be seen naked by one TSA agent at an airport is rather weak." Where is the neglect here? What did Bishop Santay or any.of the other Priests neglect doing?

I have given you concrete evidence based on my personal experience with these Priests and these Bishops, including experience from no more than 2 days ago on Christmas, that what you are saying is false. Yet you continue in this allegation, based on nothing more than your mother's recollection of what Fr. Jenkins told her, unless you have further evidence to add that you have not presented yet.

Pathetic.

No, my Mom was accurate, having gotten some of it directly from Father Jenkins, and some from the chapel coordinator, who was in constant contact with Father Jenkins.  It's just that she's not been updated on that point, and evidently the naked body scanners were removed from airports in 2013.  Bishop Santay was consecrated in 2007, when these were still out there, and it's a fact that he conducted driving confirmation tours out of a refusal to go through those earlier models of scanners.

As for 1918, that's a good question.  Perhaps the 1917 Code was finally printed in 1918?  Sometimes they put out an "Editio Typica" first but then it doesn't hit the presses for a while?

Are they really "naked"?  From what I am reading they are generic body lines for all.