Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Stubborn, you can't find a catechism nor theologian that explains things the way you "understand" it, yet you freely dismiss everybody else. Now you want us to believe the official catechisms are not approved sources.
The thing to notice with you and bowler is that you dismiss every source and provide none of your own. You can't find a catechism nor theologian that explains things the way you "understand" it, yet you freely dismiss everybody else.
You've done nothing to address the real issues here, one of which is your inability to produce any authority that EXPLAINS things the way you do. You reject every source provided to you. ALL catechisms and theologians are wrong and you are correct.
Do I condemn ALL the known catechisms and theological manuals in favor of my own opinion (you have never produced any approved source that EXPLAINS things the way you "understand" them)?
No, the approved sources are the docuмentation.
I've given you the docuмentation. You've rejected it in favor of your own interpretations, like a typical liberal Catholic.
SJB, based on what you have stated below, can you provide an approved source that explains Vatican II and its aftermath the way you do?How does explain. Approved sources ceased to exist after VII :roll-laugh1:It would have to be a pre V2 source that anticipated V2 happening. :nunchaku:Don't put too much weight into my smilies, just wanted to use them.
SJB, based on what you have stated below, can you provide an approved source that explains Vatican II and its aftermath the way you do?Quote from: SJBStubborn, you can't find a catechism nor theologian that explains things the way you "understand" it, yet you freely dismiss everybody else. Now you want us to believe the official catechisms are not approved sources.Quote from: SJBThe thing to notice with you and bowler is that you dismiss every source and provide none of your own. You can't find a catechism nor theologian that explains things the way you "understand" it, yet you freely dismiss everybody else.Quote from: SJBYou've done nothing to address the real issues here, one of which is your inability to produce any authority that EXPLAINS things the way you do. You reject every source provided to you. ALL catechisms and theologians are wrong and you are correct.Quote from: SJBDo I condemn ALL the known catechisms and theological manuals in favor of my own opinion (you have never produced any approved source that EXPLAINS things the way you "understand" them)?Quote from: SJBNo, the approved sources are the docuмentation.Quote from: SJBI've given you the docuмentation. You've rejected it in favor of your own interpretations, like a typical liberal Catholic.
Is SJB a sedevacantist?
QuoteIs SJB a sedevacantist? I hope so, he is too smart to be otherwise!
Well than, happy that God didn't make me smart, I'd rather have common sense any day to be honest with you. I do recall in school, students that were friends of mine, and very smart, high grades and all, but couldn't make a decision. I think it is because they are so smart that life seems so complicated to them.
Quote from: AlcuinSJB, based on what you have stated below, can you provide an approved source that explains Vatican II and its aftermath the way you do?Quote from: SJBStubborn, you can't find a catechism nor theologian that explains things the way you "understand" it, yet you freely dismiss everybody else. Now you want us to believe the official catechisms are not approved sources.Quote from: SJBThe thing to notice with you and bowler is that you dismiss every source and provide none of your own. You can't find a catechism nor theologian that explains things the way you "understand" it, yet you freely dismiss everybody else.Quote from: SJBYou've done nothing to address the real issues here, one of which is your inability to produce any authority that EXPLAINS things the way you do. You reject every source provided to you. ALL catechisms and theologians are wrong and you are correct.Quote from: SJBDo I condemn ALL the known catechisms and theological manuals in favor of my own opinion (you have never produced any approved source that EXPLAINS things the way you "understand" them)?Quote from: SJBNo, the approved sources are the docuмentation.Quote from: SJBI've given you the docuмentation. You've rejected it in favor of your own interpretations, like a typical liberal Catholic.Bump - give it a shot. People are waiting...
As far as your comparison goes, "Vatican II" isn't a doctrine taught in all the catechisms and by all of the Church teaching, it is an event with an aftermath that is clearly in dispute.
Quote from: SJBAs far as your comparison goes, "Vatican II" isn't a doctrine taught in all the catechisms and by all of the Church teaching, it is an event with an aftermath that is clearly in dispute.Nonsense. Vatican II teachings are in all the modern catechisms. All the approved theologians went along with it.It's clear you have no sources that explains your position.