Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Sins of Claumny Against MHFM  (Read 6665 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline curiouscatholic23

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 388
  • Reputation: +0/-1
  • Gender: Male
Sins of Claumny Against MHFM
« on: December 17, 2011, 09:58:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/Our_Benedictine_Community.php


    I have read numerous claims against MHFM, in particular from s2srea alleging all kinds of things:

    -They are not real Benedictines
    -They live in trailers
    -They are a fradulent racket
    -They are con men
    -They are in it for the money
    -They are high school dropouts


    Unless you can provide sufficient evidence for these claims, IMO these are sins of calumny, possibly mortal if you are directly lying.

    Brother Joseph Natale founded MHFM if you actually click on the link. Unless you can prove otherwise, we as catholics are bound to take the word of another catholic seriously. Unless you can totally disprove the link I provided, there is no reason to state that MHFM is lying. Prove it. Otherwise its gossip.




    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4803
    • Reputation: +2007/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Sins of Claumny Against MHFM
    « Reply #1 on: December 17, 2011, 10:27:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from the Catholic Encyclopedia given by the Dimonds --
    Quote
    During the first four or five centuries after the death of St. Benedict there existed no organic bond of union among the various monasteries other than the Rule itself and obedience to the Holy See.  According to St. Benedict, each Benedictine monastery constituted an independent family,(7) the members of which elected their own superior.(8)  Each monastery was to be self-contained, self-governing, managing its own affairs, and subject to no external authority except that of the local diocesan bishop, whose powers of control were, however, limited to certain specific conditions.(9)


    Which bishop are they under?  True, we live in a time when epikeia is necessary, but they still need to find a bishop to submit to, don't they?

    Quote
    But Bro. Joseph was not able to complete this desire, due to the fact that he died on November 11, 1995.  After Bro. Joseph died, Bro. Michael Dimond, O.S.B. was elected superior of the community.  Bro. Michael immediately went to work to fulfill Bro. Joseph’s wish to move the community to New York.  In late 1997, Most Holy Family Monastery finally finished moving the community and its belongings to New York.

     

    Bro. Michael Dimond O.S.B.

    Raised in a family with no religion, Bro. Michael Dimond converted to Catholicism at the age of 15.  Brother Michael Dimond entered Most Holy Family Monastery in 1992 at the age of 19, a short time after graduating from high school.  Brother Michael Dimond’s father graduated from Princeton University in New Jersey and his mother graduated from Stanford University in California.  Brother Michael Dimond was elected superior of Most Holy Family Monastery in late 1995.  Bro. Dimond took his final vows before a validly ordained priest.


    Look how they transition from speaking about Bro. Joseph Natale to Michael Dimond taking vows before a "validly ordained priest."  In other words, there's no connection to Bro. Joseph Natale except that they are claiming to continue his work because they knew him.  That's like if a 90-year old monk with true Holy Orders lived in my house for a week, then died, and afterwards I began claiming my house was a monastery and I was continuing his work.  

    Also, notice how they don't mention who this "validly ordained priest" that M. Dimond took vows in front of is.  No name.  Don't you think if they wanted to prove they were monks, they could give a name?  

    I am not an expert on religious orders, so I'll stop there.  But what are the conditions that must be met in order to be a true monastery?  Someone who knows more, please chime in.  I would guess that, at the very least, there must be submission to a bishop.  I would also assume that the superior would have to have Holy Orders.  That just seems like common sense, because I have never heard of a monastery run by a layman with no one there to confect the Eucharist, totally separate from any authority.



     
    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.


    Offline s2srea

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5106
    • Reputation: +3896/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Sins of Claumny Against MHFM
    « Reply #2 on: December 17, 2011, 10:36:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Why thank you Raoul...

    CC?......

    Offline curiouscatholic23

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 388
    • Reputation: +0/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Sins of Claumny Against MHFM
    « Reply #3 on: December 17, 2011, 10:49:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: s2srea
    Why thank you Raoul...

    CC?......


    If MHFM believes in John 3:5 as it is written, rejects Bendict XVI, and rejects NFP, what Bishop are they supposed to be under? There is only one bishop in the US to my knowledge who is on the same page with them on these issues.
    The ony true bishop in America to my knowledge that does not hold any hersies is Bishop Neal Webster, and he is Knoxville, TN. He is on good terms with MHFM.


    Offline s2srea

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5106
    • Reputation: +3896/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Sins of Claumny Against MHFM
    « Reply #4 on: December 17, 2011, 10:53:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    -They are in it for the money


    This one is the easiest to me. Its pure logic. Here's the MHFM racket's situation and plan for financial sustenance:

    -We're not priests.
    --No one will ever ordain us.
    ---We're not under a bishop (or anyone) like we should be.
    ----People won't donate to us if they're donating to their own priests.

    Solution: Convince fools that there are no priests, or at least none worth supporting financially.

    So is it any wonder that CC223 says this, in regards to seeking out a priests advice:

    Quote
    Why? They all believe in NFP, BOD, & Invincible ignorance.

     


    Offline curiouscatholic23

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 388
    • Reputation: +0/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Sins of Claumny Against MHFM
    « Reply #5 on: December 17, 2011, 10:55:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: s2srea
    Quote
    -They are in it for the money


    This one is the easiest to me. Its pure logic. Here's the MHFM racket's situation and plan for financial sustenance:

    -We're not priests.
    --No one will ever ordain us.
    ---We're not under a bishop (or anyone) like we should be.
    ----People won't donate to us if they're donating to their own priests.

    Solution: Convince fools that there are no priests, or at least none worth supporting financially.
     


    All of this is s2srea's PERSONAL speculation. No facts as usual.


    Offline s2srea

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5106
    • Reputation: +3896/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Sins of Claumny Against MHFM
    « Reply #6 on: December 17, 2011, 10:58:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: curiouscatholic23
    Quote from: s2srea
    Why thank you Raoul...

    CC?......


    If MHFM believes in John 3:5 as it is written...


    You sound like a damned Protestant. Congratulations.

    Quote
    The ony true bishop in America to my knowledge that does not hold any hersies is Bishop Neal Webster, and he is Knoxville, TN. He is on good terms with MHFM.


    Nice... a reject that no one would ordain for 25 years, and a Slupski bishop... He's got a lot going for him... NOT.

    Offline s2srea

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5106
    • Reputation: +3896/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Sins of Claumny Against MHFM
    « Reply #7 on: December 17, 2011, 10:59:36 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: curiouscatholic23
    Quote from: s2srea
    Why thank you Raoul...

    CC?......


    If MHFM believes in John 3:5 as it is written, rejects Bendict XVI, and rejects NFP, what Bishop are they supposed to be under? There is only one bishop in the US to my knowledge who is on the same page with them on these issues.
    The ony true bishop in America to my knowledge that does not hold any hersies is Bishop Neal Webster, and he is Knoxville, TN. He is on good terms with MHFM.



    You failed to address ANYTHING in Raouls post. You're starting to turn into... Mike... no Peter- no Mike Dimond! Cool!


    Offline curiouscatholic23

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 388
    • Reputation: +0/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Sins of Claumny Against MHFM
    « Reply #8 on: December 17, 2011, 11:02:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: s2srea
    Quote from: curiouscatholic23
    Quote from: s2srea
    Why thank you Raoul...

    CC?......


    If MHFM believes in John 3:5 as it is written, rejects Bendict XVI, and rejects NFP, what Bishop are they supposed to be under? There is only one bishop in the US to my knowledge who is on the same page with them on these issues.
    The ony true bishop in America to my knowledge that does not hold any hersies is Bishop Neal Webster, and he is Knoxville, TN. He is on good terms with MHFM.



    You failed to address ANYTHING in Raouls post. You're starting to turn into... Mike... no Peter- no Mike Dimond! Cool!


    No you never addressed my comment.

    What bishop would you like them to submit themselves to? They are feeneyite sedes who reject NFP. Almost no bishop in the world meets this criteria except Bp. Neal Webster.

    Offline s2srea

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5106
    • Reputation: +3896/-48
    • Gender: Male
    Sins of Claumny Against MHFM
    « Reply #9 on: December 17, 2011, 11:04:14 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •  :facepalm:....



     :pray:


    Goodnight.

    Offline curiouscatholic23

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 388
    • Reputation: +0/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Sins of Claumny Against MHFM
    « Reply #10 on: December 17, 2011, 11:06:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: s2srea
    :facepalm:....



     :pray:


    Goodnight.


    I will pray that you recognize the fallacies and schismatic attitude of the SSPX position (even when they have been presented to you over and over again) and that you will finally reject Benedict XVI as pope.

    As well as:

    -Interpreting John 3:5 AS IT IS WRITTEN (Trent)
    -Embracing Casti Connubi (Pius XI) which means no NFP


    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4803
    • Reputation: +2007/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Sins of Claumny Against MHFM
    « Reply #11 on: December 18, 2011, 01:52:07 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • So your contention, CC23, is that the Church is being kept alive solely by Bishop Neal Webster?  Because without bishops there is no Church, no apostolic succession.  And if NFP, BOD and invincible ignorance are heresies, then all the bishops except him are heretics who are outside the Church.

    I wonder if this fantasy appeals to some people; makes them feel special to be part of the last few.  At any rate, the very least you should be doing is praying that Bishop Neal Webster has a nice long life.

    By the way, if Bp. Neal Webster agrees with them, yes, they should seek him out and put themselves under his authority.  If there are no bishops who agree with them, they can't be monks, as far as I understand it.  Until I hear exactly who this "valid priest" was who they took vows in front of, that is.

    I wouldn't agree with S2Srea that they're in it for the money.  That may be rash judgment there, S2Srea.  I think they probably believe in what they're doing and justify it to themselves, probably have fooled themselves into believing they have to do what they're doing.  
    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.

    Offline Pepsuber

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 170
    • Reputation: +50/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Sins of Claumny Against MHFM
    « Reply #12 on: December 19, 2011, 10:35:01 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: curiouscatholic23
    I have read numerous claims against MHFM, in particular from s2srea alleging all kinds of things:

    I don't know anything about the allegations other than the first, but the fact of the matter is that they aren't real Benedictines. One doesn't become a Benedictine monk by calling oneself a Benedictine monk. Do they pray the Divine Office? According to Google there is not a single reference to the phrase "divine office" on their entire web site. They promote the 15-decade rosary and mention that they have devotions to particular saints. Nothing about the Divine Office. It's hard to conceive of a monk, especially a Benedictine monk, who doesn't pray the Office - the Rule of St. Benedict has 12 chapters (8-19) on how to pray the Office.

    What about Benedictine hospitality? Can one visit Most Holy Family Monastery and be received as Christ (Rule ch. 53)?

    I can state with certainty that the current incarnation of MHFM bears no relation to that founded by Br. Joseph Natale.

    Offline Pepsuber

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 170
    • Reputation: +50/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Sins of Claumny Against MHFM
    « Reply #13 on: December 19, 2011, 10:38:59 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: curiouscatholic23
    -Embracing Casti Connubi (Pius XI) which means no NFP

    Casti Connubii 53 makes allowance for periodic continence in marriage, i.e., NFP.

    Offline Pepsuber

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 170
    • Reputation: +50/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Sins of Claumny Against MHFM
    « Reply #14 on: December 19, 2011, 01:27:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: curiouscatholic23
    If MHFM believes in John 3:5 as it is written, rejects Bendict XVI, and rejects NFP, what Bishop are they supposed to be under?

    It's not surprising that those who are in error would have difficulty in finding a bishop.

    It's also worthwhile to point out that even if the Dimond brothers were not in error on these issues that there could be many other reasons why they would not be accepted into the religious life. I'm not saying that there are such reasons in their case, only that there could be. How can one even be certain that they were called to the religious life?