"Signs that a Catholic is tainted with Liberalism (false Catholicity)
- He subjects commands and teachings of the Pope to the scrutiny of his own intellect"
Wouldn't everyone in here still be in the novus ordo if this was the case? or does this just apply to pre-Vatican II teachings and not the recent pope?
Actually RA, not only is this above quote is not from the book, it is an adulterated version of what actually is in the book, adulterated to suit the specific, corrupted agenda of bosco.
What the book actually says is:
Such is the general negation uttered by Liberalism. From this radical denial of revealed truth in
general, naturally follows the denial of particular dogmas in whole or in part, as circuŠ¼stances
present them in opposition to its rationalistic judgement. Thus, for instance, it denies the validity
of faith by baptism, when it admits or supposes the equality of any or all religious cults; it denies
the sanctity of marriage, when it sanctions so called civil marriages; it denies the infallibility of
the Roman Pontiff, when it refuses to accept as laws his official commands and teachings, and
subjects them to the scrutiny of its own intellect, not to assure itself of their authenticity, as
is legitimate, but to sit in defiant judgement upon their contents.
The OP is the one who adheres to the denial of particular dogmas and refuses to accept as the law, the popes' infallible teachings and commands, but in keeping with his agenda of slandering those who accept and bind themselves too, and accept as law those infallible teachings of popes, he necessarily must adulterate what the book actually says. The man is iniquitous.
Topic: Signs that a Catholic is tainted with Liberalism (Read 2953 times)