Author Topic: Should sedevacantists be re-baptized?  (Read 1584 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CM

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2726
  • Reputation: +1/-0
Should sedevacantists be re-baptized?
« Reply #15 on: June 28, 2009, 02:13:25 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Once you resolve all issues and abjure.  Don't claim something that is technically not true, it is dishonest.  I'm only saying it for your benefit.

    Offline CM

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2726
    • Reputation: +1/-0
    Should sedevacantists be re-baptized?
    « Reply #16 on: June 28, 2009, 02:16:52 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Prodinoscopus, there was once a condemnation made against the errors of the Jansenists and it reads as follows:

    Pope Alexander VIII, Errors of the Jansenists, #28: "Baptism is valid when conferred by a minister who observes all the external rite and form of baptizing, but within his heart resolves, I do not intend what the Church does." - CONDEMNED

    I was baptized in the Anglican communion as an infant, but in light of the above condemned proposition, I had myself conditionally baptized (re-baptism, per se, is a sacrilege, but you know that) by an apostate after I had abjured before him and another man.  I still question its validity and I desire to be conditionally baptized by someone else I trust to have the right intention.


     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16