Should Pope Francis resign after Synod defeat??
Shocking article:
http://www.irishcentral.com/opinion/others/The-reign-of-Pope-Francis-the-reformer-is-over.html
What is shocking about that article? I am not familiar with the source, but it is clearly a modernist/liberal "everybody sacrifice integrity to simply 'get along'" source. What is so shocking about such a source painting the Church as being guilty of the cardinal secular sins of "intolerance," "non-inclusiveness," and "being behind the times?"
It is so much a par for the course secular article, that I fail to see why you chose to link the trash here.
The outcome of the synod has nothing to do with whether I think Frank should resign or not. I have viewed him as a particularly undesirable claimant of St. Peter's Chair since his early non-Catholic mutterings. And he has persisted in these non-Catholic mutterings and the mutterings have become more outrageous.
But I certainly do not commiserate with the fag-lobby who speaks in that wretched article that you linked as though it should have the slightest influence on Catholic discussion. Why should the thoughts of a bunch of fαɢs matter--whining and crying about not getting their way and seeing Christ slapped in the face again--asserting "failure" because the sins they sought to have embraced and loved were rejected...
I suppose I would like to see him resign so we have some chance of a bit more respectable claimant coming to the Chair. But, on the other hand, his outrageousness seems to have shaken some from their false comfort in conciliardom.