CathInfo.com

Nobody knows WHAT it is.  Heck, it doesn't even have an assigned gender.  Maybe Herm is short for hermaphrodite for all we know.

This Herm either won't or can't even articulate itself to the point that anyone has any idea where it stands on the Crisis.

Even though he does not come out and admit it, he has to accept all the post Vatican II popes and Vatican II.  Otherwise, based on his assertions, he would have to believe that the Roman Church has defected.  Don't you see?  I think he knows that to admit this here would create a firestorm.

IF that is not true, then he could always deny it.  But he has not done so to date.

Well, what's your thoughts? Has the Roman Church defected? If not, please explain...

I've already explained my thoughts on the matter.  What we haven't heard from you is an explanation of your position ... to the point that no one knows what you are, R&R, Resistance, some weird flavor of SV (like those who think we haven't had a pope since St. Pius X), Palmerian, follower of Pope Michael, Novus Ordo, Orthodox, Old Catholic, man or woman?

Obviously the Roman Church and the Catholic Church at large have not defected; they can't defect.  Question is how we reconcile this truth with what we're seeing in the Crisis.

And obviously no Catholic believes that the Church has defected, so you're beating a dead horse and wasting everyone's time.

Until you explain what your position on the Crisis is, I'm not going to bother responding to you anymore ... since we're wasting our time trying to infer a position from you.  Sure, different groups of Traditional Catholics accuse other groups of having a theology which implies a defection, but until we hear your actual argument, there's nothing more to discuss with you.