CathInfo.com

This is different from mere visits to ѕуηαgσgυєs. This is actually discouraging the converting of souls to Christ.

I did not say they are the SAME, genius.  They go hand in hand.

V2 has been ALL ABOUT discouraging conversion.  Where the hell have you been?

The Sedes have more in common with the Neo-Caths because they share their same false premise regarding infallibility.

You might as well be commenting upon the specific gravity of dog turd.  Why not DISCUSS instead of PRESUMING?  Chuck what others have told you others think and learn what others think by ASKING them.

StevusMagnus said:

"The Sedes have more in common with the Neo-Caths because they share their same false premise regarding infallibility."

Boy, talk about a logical fallacy.  Just another emotional argument that really isn't one ( an argument ).

What is this false premise?  The neo-Caths believe everything that Ratzinger says, because they think he's always infallible, as you accuse us of believing?  No, the sedes have the correct view of infallibility, which is that a Pope is infallible when he teaches on matters of faith and morals to the universal Church i.e. in encyclicals, but not necessarily in speeches.  

You think he is infallible only when he speaks ex cathedra, correct, that means twice in the last two centuries?  What kind of Church is it that you have created in your fevered imagination, Stevus?

Also, I don't know of any "neo-Cath," whatever that is, who believes everything that Ratzinger says, simply because it's impossible for anyone to really get a bead on what he says.  That is because he says everything and its opposite.

This "neo-Cath" you keep railing against, in truth, doesn't really exist.  It's just some way to make you think you're fighting the good fight.  There are all kinds of Catholics with all kinds of wrong beliefs, either innocently mistaken and thus not yet heretics, or believing things that aren't directly against the faith -- like that Israel is great -- and there are many who call themselves Catholics but really aren't.  Among this large and varied group, I'm not sure exactly what constitutes a "neo-Cath."  

The term seems very relative.  And if it is, that makes you a neo-Cath relative to, say, Telesphorus, among others, since you have more error than many others on this forum ( look what you did gladius ).  Take the plank out of your own eye.

 

How is stevus still alive on this forum? Oh yeah, because its an SSPX place, thats right. Every imbecile and their mother can get a word in. But the Truth? Na, push the Truth aside for sticking with the group and feeling comradery of the Novus Ordo/false trad ship.


Gee.