Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Crisis in the Church => Topic started by: The Great Monarch on April 18, 2010, 11:04:52 AM
-
-
Anti-Pope Augustine said:
Greetings and Apostolic Blessing from the Servant of God, Augustine, the Final Pontiff of Eternal Rome...
And then, from heaven itself will come the master of the keys, the ruler of the gates of hades and all things, the steward of the kingdom, the vicar of Christ, Peter the Apostle, the ancient one who reflected God upon his face, who raised the dead, who calmed the serpents, and who parted the waters of the godless and shameless to create an empire of righteousness, through which the righteous walked unto the plains of the wilderness, and then from thence to the promised land."
You said you were the final Pontiff and now you're talking about another pontiff who comes down from heaven later. Or are you planning to go to heaven and then come back down for dramatic effect?
-
You said you were the final Pontiff and now you're talking about another pontiff who comes down from heaven later. Or are you planning to go to heaven and then come back down for dramatic effect?
Please note that this member has been banned.
This material is kept here for psychological analysis and humor purposes only.
Replied by His Supreme Royal Majesty
Reply to the comment above,
Firstly fool, do you have confirmation that Pontiff Augustine is an Anti-Pope? For if you do I would gladly love to show our Monarch the proofs so he may laugh at them with disgust. There are many proofs of his Papacy for he is the Final Pontiff. You may reply with this message saying "what proofs speak of Augustine as the Final Pontiff?", this would be our reply to you:
Obviously if St. Malachy's list is accurate, and Pope Augustine personally believes it is accurate, then yes he is Peter the Roman. For those who acknowledge prophecy this matches perfectly. The Pope that is listed prior to "Peter the Roman" is called "Gloria Olivae". Pope Augustine believes "Gloria Olivae" refers to two things.
First, "Gloria Olivae" refers to Antipope Benedict XVI. The olive branch is a symbol of the Benedictine Order. Thus, for the heretic Ratzinger call himself Benedict is a clear reference to this order. Antipope Benedict XVI also claims to be a messenger of peace. Peace is symbolized by an olive branch. A messenger of peace is one of the things the Apocalypse predicts AntiChrist will attempt to be perceived as in the final days. Obviously, Antipope Benedict XVI's doctrines about salvation for noncatholics, the praiseworthiness of false religions (referring to other religions as good and praiseworthy), and his belief that false religions have a right to be practiced freely are freemasonic doctrines and not Catholic doctrine. They promote a false peace of compromise with satan's religions. All of the doctrines Antipope Benedict XVI teaches have been condemned by true Catholic popes in various dogmatic pronouncements in prior centuries. Thus, the prophecy of Malachy on the Gloria Olivae refers to Benedict XVI, but as Antipope and not a true Pope. And this is not inconsistent with St. Malachy's other predictions concerning prior popes, because St. Malachy also has other Antipopes listed throughout his centuries long papal list. Many of these Antipopes are from centuries ago, but St. Malachy lists them and experts acknowledge that his list contains both true Popes and well known Antipopes. In fact, Saint Malachy lists every Antipope that has reigned since Vatican II, starting with Antipope John XXIII.
"Gloria Olivae" also represents another profound thing. Pope Augustine believes that "Gloria Olivae" may eventually refer to the Most Holy Family Monastery, if they convert out of their schism.
Another thing worth mentioning, and this is something the Pope realized recently on October 6, 2008, and something Pope Augustine considers profound- his name "Pope Augustine" and his ancestry, which is English, clearly make one of the main models for his papacy St. Augustine of Canterbury who was considered the "apostle to the English". It is worthwhile to note that St. Augustine of Canterbury was a Benedictine, sent to save England from satanic influence. Yet again, this matches with the phrase "Gloria Olivae". Pope Augustine believes and hopes that he too, will be instrumental, in saving the English speaking peoples from the satanic influence of the paganism to which they have devolved, and insofar as Augustine of Canterbury is his model, he too represents "Gloria Olivae" or the Glory of the Benedictine order. Thus it is no coincidence that God inspired the present pope to call himself Pope Augustine, after this great ancient Benedictine saint.
Thus, Pope Augustine would fulfill both the "Gloria Olivae" and "Peter the Roman" prophecies.
There is yet another interesting thing people should note regarding St. Malachy's list. "Peter the Roman" (the last pope on the list) does not have a number before his name in St. Malachy's list of Popes. All the other Popes are numbered. Peter the Roman does not have a number because Pope Augustine reigns during the reign of Gloria Olivae as well as after Gloria Olivae, and thus they essentially are to have the same number on the list because they reign at the same time. This has clearly been fulfilled. Pope Augustine is the only traditional claimant to the papacy who started his reign during the reign of Antipope Benedict XVI. The false "traditional" popes, such as Antipope Michael and Antipope Pius XIII, began their reigns before Benedict XVI (Gloria Olivae). This does not correspond to the numbering in Malachy's list. They would have to be reigning before Gloria Olivae, yet be listed after Gloria Olivae as if they are also Peter the Roman. This obviously makes no sense whatsoever. Augustine is the only claimant that matches the numbering on Malachy's list.
Another reason that Peter the Roman is unnumbered is because Pope Augustine fulfills both Gloria Olivae and Peter the Roman and is the fulfillment of both names on the list, both in whatever work he may eventually do with the Benedictine order in its prophesied work of the last days, and also his independent naming after Augustine of Canterbury, OSB.
A third reason why Peter the Roman is not numbered is because it signifies that Peter the Roman, the true Pontiff, is eclipsed and hidden from view by the false papacy of Antipope Benedict XVI. This fulfills the famous prophecy of LaSallete, where Our Lady the Blessed Virgin Mary Mother of God declared "Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of AntiChrist, the Church will be in eclipse." (September, 1846, part of the message in the vision given to Melanie). We are the true papacy, and we have been eclipsed for a time by the false papacy of Antipope Benedict XVI.
And your reply would be this "irony".
Thirdly in the Sermon he was speaking in the paragraph you quoted Peter, the first Pontiff. By prophecy Peter will come from the Heavens anointing Augustine. If you knew anything of literature or biblical wording you would know that he was referring to Peter the first Pontiff who was crucified by Nero the Roman Emperor. I now get the impression you feel like a fool after reading this. Well, do you?
Issued by His Supreme Royal Majesty
Knights of the Castilian Royal Court
-
Anti-Pope Augustine said:
Thirdly in the Sermon he was speaking in the paragraph you quoted Peter, the first Pontiff. By prophecy Peter will come from the Heavens anointing Augustine. If you knew anything of literature or biblical wording you would know that he was referring to Peter the first Pontiff who was crucified by Nero the Roman Emperor. I now get the impression you feel like a fool after reading this. Well, do you?
The prophecy says that Peter and Paul come from heaven to anoint a Pope, not just Peter. I also don't recognize Peter in what you say here:
"... The ancient one who reflected God upon his face, who raised the dead, who calmed the serpents..."
I have never heard Peter spoken of as having reflected God on his face, of raising the dead, or of calming serpents, but go ahead and correct me if I'm wrong.
The rest of your prophetic interpretation is garbled and incoherent. Benedict XVI is Glory of the Olive but at the same time you are Glory of the Olive, and also Peter the Roman? Sorry, doesn't work. Not that I believe you really think you are either a Pope or the Monarch, I can't tell which is which anymore.
But for the sake of others reading this thread, the St. Malachy prophecies could easily be faked. There are also many ways to view them, even if they are true. Pius XII according to that prophecy would be the "Angelic Pastor," and Pius XII went so far as to embrace this title, participating in a docuмentary called "Pastor Angelicus." ( I would love to see this film ). Well, as we all know, the real Angelic Pastor is the Pope who restores the world to Catholicism along with the Great Monarch, and that was not Pius XII.
So either the St. Malachy prophecy contradicts the Great Monarch prophecies, in which case you are out of luck, because you rely on both of them together, or there are two Angelic Pastors, one of whom is a counterfeit given that title by St. Malachy with some kind of sarcasm. As you point out, he lists all the anti-Popes in his prophecy as well as the Popes, without distinguishing between them.
In that case, with Pius XII being the counterfeit Angelic Pastor, with the real Angelic Pastor yet to come, we can read St. Malachy's prophecy two ways. One, we are now stopped in between Intrepid Faith ( Pius XI ) and the Angelic Pastor. But in case the current anti-Popes are listed, and that would be consistent with the rest of the prophecy, then Benedict and Benedict alone really is Glory of the Olive. But that doesn't mean much, because the prophecy doesn't tell you how many Popes exist between the anti-Pope Glory of the Olive and Peter the Roman -- who may very well be the Anti-Christ.
There could be fifteen Popes before Peter the Roman. The Angelic Shepherd/Pastor is not necessarily the same as Peter the Roman. In fact I'd say for sure he is not -- primarily because he almost surely will not be ruling from Rome, and will be ruling from France! Peter the Roman may take power much later, after Rome is rebuilt and again, may be the Antichrist. Something about the way "St. Malachy" builds up to Peter the Roman feels sinister.
-
I should mention in passing that I don't believe the Great Monarch prophecies are necessarily true.
-
I should mention in passing that I don't believe the Great Monarch prophecies are necessarily true.
We have much to say to your comment above. But, due to increased signs we will only say, "we may be wrong, but we will have no consequence. You will if you are wrong". Also, the Monarch did not write this, the Pontiff did, so please email him if you have questions.
-
Firstly fool, do you have confirmation that Pontiff Augustine is an Anti-Pope? For if you do I would gladly love to show our Monarch the proofs so he may laugh at them with disgust.
To Your non-Royal and non-Pontifical Jackasses,
You reveal quite a bit more about your true spirit by the way you responded to Mike's question. If this ridiculous reply came from the (admittedly-yet-to-be-crowned) Monarch, why does he tell us that he, supposedly the Monarch, would be glad to show such and such to "our Monarch"?
Why not put down the crack pipe, lay off the prescription drugs and Drano-spiked lemonade, and engage/reengage reality? Although these times ARE tough, I am sure you would feel unspeakably delightful relief when you drop this nonsense, no matter what other, sane course you pursue.
Godspeed :)
-
gladius,
This is an official posting of the Monarch,
I am sorry for the rudeness coming from the last post. That was not I but a person who I had appointed to reply to post. But, I had not banned him for I had witnessed your true colors through his irresponsible post. Your previous post was peasant like and very rude, much more than the previous post coming from my profile. So, I now have no hopes in you and so does now the Pontiff. From your first post we, The Pontiff and I, have seen good will in you now but now we see it as a lie. So now we ban you from salvation. I am actually disgusted that I had admired your kind words. May the Mighty swords of GOD smite you with the worst of happenings you despicable, lost soul. It saddens me to do this to you, and you may laugh from this post here forth. But, I am of truth and of sanity. If you laugh and mock I you mock God. But, I must thank thee for you fulfill the prophecy. You and your people do, by prophecy all shall mock the Monarch and Pontiff until the start of their reign. So thank you with the best of intentions because you just prove to us and the world the Papacy and Great Monarchy are completely real.
Issued by the Official Royal Majesty
Knights of the Royal Court
-
No biggie, GM. Carry on... :cheers:
-
This is again the Official Great Monarch,
Let us part, you to go on your path and mine on my path. Whoever is wrong is wrong and whoever is right is right. There is no consequence to me if I am wrong but to you there is much. Just remember so, that I had warned you.
Issued by His Supreme Royal Majesty
-
You have lost the Picayune Nonarch's approbation, and that's good news for you, Eamon.
One could beat their brains in all day trying to figure out just what the objective of this elaborate stunt really is. There has to be some purpose to it. Maybe it is an attempt to discredit Great Monarch prophecies and make them seem absurd. His use of scripture sometimes shows a great expertise; even when he's misusing it he is familiar with its terminology inside and out. But why would someone who knows the Bible this well waste his time with such frivolity?
If this is the same person who runs the Jansenist website, we are dealing with a truly inscrutable character. When I think of those who have a knowledge of the ways of God, and yet use that knowledge to mock and confuse, I tend to think of serpents and gardens and apples. That is why I don't really like messing with this guy.
-
I am not the one who runs that website you stated above. I swear on my heart I am serious, can you not see the truth. If you do not believe me I am ok for I see it to be. Also, if you may please tell me the website you stated above's link. I would like to write a review on it as a post on my site and also as a sermon. And also, do you believe Augustine to run that website. I will also gladly state anything about me. Ask.