Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Poll

Sedevacantists:if you were convinced sede-ism was wrong, what would you do next?

Become an R&R Traditionalist
12 (35.3%)
Become an Indult Traditionalist
6 (17.6%)
Become an NO Cath Conservative
9 (26.5%)
Become a very liberal Catholic
1 (2.9%)
Cease to practice Catholicism
6 (17.6%)

Total Members Voted: 28

Author Topic: Sedevacantists:if you were convinced sede-ism was wrong, what would you do next?  (Read 26934 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

But now with Frank it is even worse.  The "pope" himself worshipped pagan gods in the Vatican.

There was Montini with the Ephod, not less bad.

As far as I know, there were a few Catholics, who were in high alert since Roncalli's Pacem in terris (1963), and who warned others before the robber council was over in 1965.

There was Montini with the Ephod, not less bad.

As far as I know, there were a few Catholics, who were in high alert since Roncalli's Pacem in terris (1963), and who warned others before the robber council was over in 1965.
I have heard that there was a priest who called sede vacante during Roncalli's "reign".  But I cannot find a reference for it.  Yes, Montini with the Ephod and the Deuce and the Bhudda in Assisi.  I guess the reason everyone is on Frank's case is that he is pro-abortion and pro-pervert as well.  But Montini was a pervert (according to Randy Engel's research) and everyone knows the Deuce protected Marcial Maciel.  So I don't know.  Frank sure knows how to push everyone's buttons.


What/who is "the Deuce"?

Ok "protected Maciel"? But why "Deuce"?

What/who is "the Deuce"?

Ok "protected Maciel"? But why "Deuce"?
John Paul Deuce

John Paul Deuce

Ok. Thank you. My dictionary said "Einstand" (both players same score), but it is more general: "two".