Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Poll

Sedevacantists:if you were convinced sede-ism was wrong, what would you do next?

Become an R&R Traditionalist
12 (35.3%)
Become an Indult Traditionalist
6 (17.6%)
Become an NO Cath Conservative
9 (26.5%)
Become a very liberal Catholic
1 (2.9%)
Cease to practice Catholicism
6 (17.6%)

Total Members Voted: 28

Author Topic: Sedevacantists:if you were convinced sede-ism was wrong, what would you do next?  (Read 26832 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Simple Question. Discussion Later.

Offline Quo vadis Domine

  • Supporter
In the running for the most ridiculous thread on Cathinfo.


If Bergoglio is the pope of the Catholic Church, then the Catholic Church has defected and Christianity itself is a false religion.

When it comes down to it, it seems that some sedevacantists have simply lost faith in the Catholic Church. Sedevacantism is at best an opinion only. It is not a dogma; it is arguably (especially in its 62+year/indefinite variants) a heresy directly opposed to the defined dogma of St. Peter's Perpetual Successors. Sedevacantists have forgotten what it means to say "to the best of my knowledge and judgment, such and such seems to have happened. Nevertheless, I am not infallible; and, if the Church judges otherwise, I retract my opinion and submit to the judgment of the Church, my Mother". Sedes no longer know why Roman Catholics have always spoken like this and have never held anything like sedevacantist opinions as dogma. Even Savonarola the sedevacantist was ready to retract his opinion; but modern sedes may give up on Christianity before they acknowledge that the Popes from John XXIII to Pope Francis have indeed been Roman Catholic Popes.

If Bergoglio is the pope of the Catholic Church, then the Catholic Church has defected and Christianity itself is a false religion.
Only if you think there is no such thing as the “authentic magisterium “ (ie., teachings “promulgated” by those invested with office, but which are non-magisterial due to lacking universality of time; such teachings are ipso facto those of private doctors which have gained widespread assent and a counterfeit officiality by using the organs of the Church for diffusion).

Fr. LeFloch (Lefebvre’s seminary rector in Rome) predicted the error of sedevacantism back in 1926:

The heresy which is now being born will become the most dangerous of all; the exaggeration of the respect due to the pope and the illegitimate extension of his infallibility.”

http://archives.sspx.org/miscellaneous/infallible_magisterium.htm