Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Poll

Sedevacantists:if you were convinced sede-ism was wrong, what would you do next?

Become an R&R Traditionalist
12 (35.3%)
Become an Indult Traditionalist
6 (17.6%)
Become an NO Cath Conservative
9 (26.5%)
Become a very liberal Catholic
1 (2.9%)
Cease to practice Catholicism
6 (17.6%)

Total Members Voted: 28

Author Topic: Sedevacantists:if you were convinced sede-ism was wrong, what would you do next?  (Read 26931 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Quo vadis Domine

  • Supporter





The heresy which is now being born will become the most dangerous of all; the exaggeration of the respect due to the pope and the illegitimate extension of his infallibility


Can we say Gallicanism? What a stupid and ridiculous statement. Yeah, the most “dangerous” heresy of all! 😂

Was modernism on his radar? Sean, you believe in the Church of the superfluous pope. In your bizarre idea of the Church, the pope is unnecessary, he actually has no function except on rare occasions he proclaims a dogma, otherwise he’s just a figurehead. You R&R people want your cake and eat it too, sorry the Church doesn’t work that way. You have to erroneously lower the status of the pope and the papacy in order to support your erroneous thesis. Back 20 years ago the confusion was understandable, it’s wearing a bit thin today.
Also, just because Archbishop Lefebvre did much good for the Church, didn’t mean he was perfect, he wasn’t, sorry.


Can we say Gallicanism? What a stupid and ridiculous statement. Yeah, the most “dangerous” heresy of all! 😂

Was modernism on his radar? Sean, you believe in the Church of the superfluous pope. In your bizarre idea of the Church, the pope is unnecessary, he actually has no function except on rare occasions he proclaims a dogma, otherwise he’s just a figurehead. You R&R people want your cake and eat it too, sorry the Church doesn’t work that way. You have to erroneously lower the status of the pope and the papacy in order to support your erroneous thesis. Back 20 years ago the confusion was understandable, it’s wearing a bit thin today.
Also, just because Archbishop Lefebvre did much good for the Church, didn’t mean he was perfect, he wasn’t, sorry.
Typical sede gibberish, showing you never bothered to read the article (probably because you intuit it would threaten your false faith).
Sedevacantism is its own liberal religion of papalotry:
Everything is infallible, or he isn’t the pope.


Offline Quo vadis Domine

  • Supporter
Typical sede gibberish, showing you never bothered to read the article (probably because you intuit it would threaten your false faith).
Sedevacantism is its own liberal religion of papalotry:
Everything is infallible, or he isn’t the pope.


No Sean, you don’t just lower the status of the papacy, you border on hating it. Frankly, I find it repulsive. If I thought Bergoglio was a real pope, I would obey him unquestionably. Obviously, I can’t because he’s a heretic and a heretic is not a Catholic and someone who is not a Catholic can’t possibly be the head of the Catholic Church.


But, for you, you have a dilemma, your pope is a heretical communist, what are you to do??? The Catholic
attitude would be to either accept him as a true pope and obey his decisions or to reject him as a false shepherd. No, you want your cake and eat it too and do you know why? I suspect that you have been brainwashed(possibly from an early age) to believe, a priori, that the R&R position is infallibly right and that the sedevacantist position is infallibly wrong. You won’t, nay, you can’t allow yourself the notion that you could possibly be wrong. Think man!


Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter

Quote
 If I thought Bergoglio was a real pope, I would obey him unquestionably.
That's not catholic at all.

Offline Quo vadis Domine

  • Supporter
That's not catholic at all.
Oh really? So you don’t owe obedience to the pope? Is this what the R&R position has come down to? Why do I bother?