Author Topic: Sedevacantism vs. the Catholic Faith (Read 5855 times)

Belloc · « **Reply #75 on:** October 12, 2009, 03:46:02 PM »

Quote from: Catholic Martyr

...conclave.

Conclilliarism?

what were to happen if al lSV and clergy came to ROme to do just that? Clsuter and a big one......look how they have splintered and launced a multi-level cινιℓ ωαr on each other....

a Conclave, yup that would be neat and clean.... :heretic:

SJB · « **Reply #76 on:** October 12, 2009, 04:20:53 PM »

Quote from: Caminus

Quote from: SJB
Quote from: Caminus
So it's true you hate golf and like to eat pie on Sunday's. What are you talking about man?

Are you playing stupid, dude?

Listen, dude, I don't know what the hell you're talking about. Why don't you explain your freakin' point, k?

Are you upset?

Caminus · « **Reply #77 on:** October 12, 2009, 04:25:19 PM »

Wow. You're insightful. I haven't the slightest idea where you are coming from, nor where you are going. You came out of left field with my alleged "interpretation" of the conditions of infallibility and a bishops relatio on the matter, as it was NOWHERE on the radar. What are you flippin' talking about? So, kindly explain why you started in on this so I can respond accordingly or drop it. I don't think I can state it any more clearly.

SJB · « **Reply #78 on:** October 12, 2009, 04:58:01 PM »

Quote from: Caminus

Wow. You're insightful. I haven't the slightest idea where you are coming from, nor where you are going. You came out of left field with my alleged "interpretation" of the conditions of infallibility and a bishops relatio on the matter, as it was NOWHERE on the radar. What are you flippin' talking about? So, kindly explain why you started in on this so I can respond accordingly or drop it. I don't think I can state it any more clearly.

I'm just asking if you accept sources other than your own reading of Vatican I.

Quote from: SJB

Just like the "obvious meaning" of the things quoted by catholikMartyr? :)

Would you accept Bp. Gasser's Relatio...or some approved theologian's intrepretations?

I was comparing you to CM...as he always claims the meaning is so obvious and he is infallible in his understanding.

Do you get it now?

Caminus · « **Reply #79 on:** October 13, 2009, 02:15:28 AM »

Ok, you're apparently not getting this. I'll ask one more time: Why did you ask me about this in the first place?

Caminus · « **Reply #80 on:** October 13, 2009, 02:21:17 AM »

And CM claims his pure interpretation in contradiction to other magisterial teaching as well as the Fathers. Merely asserting that we take the words in their plain sense isn't doing what CM does. Not even remotely. You'll have to find another way to insult me.

SJB · « **Reply #81 on:** October 13, 2009, 08:48:20 AM »

Quote from: Caminus

Ok, you're apparently not getting this. I'll ask one more time: Why did you ask me about this in the first place?

I'm just asking if you accept sources other than your own reading of Vatican I.

It a really simple question.