Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Signing the V2 Docuмents and Heresy  (Read 4968 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Quo vadis Domine

  • Supporter
Re: Signing the V2 Docuмents and Heresy
« Reply #40 on: July 08, 2023, 05:37:04 PM »
What does the infallibility of the OUM have to do with Assisi or communion for non-Catholics?  But to answer your question, I think Assisi was a bad idea and I am not in favor of Sedevacantists or any other non-Catholics receiving communion. 

The alternative position I am advocating for you is abandoning all your errors and heresies and joining the Roman Catholic Church.

Well, your church (the NO church) the one who stole our buildings, our property, and our name, *officially* teaches that you can be saved without professing the Catholic Faith and even if you are not baptized. Why should I join your church which you erroneously believe is the Roman Catholic Church? As a matter of fact, your “pope” says that you shouldn’t proselytize, why are you so disobedient to your unholy father?

Offline Stubborn

  • Supporter
Re: Signing the V2 Docuмents and Heresy
« Reply #41 on: July 10, 2023, 04:48:46 AM »
Your error, Stubborn, is in limiting the general protection of the Holy Spirit over the Church and over the entire body of the Magisterium (infallible or not).  You would limit this protection and guidance of the Holy Spirit to the 1% of Catholic doctrine that has been defined dogmatically in teaching that meets the notes of infallibility.  For you, everything else is up for grabs and capable of becoming thoroughly corrupted, along with the Public Worship of the Church, the Mass.  That is not possible, despite your quibbling over the precise limits of infallibility in the strict sense.
I'm not limiting anything, there is no teaching of the Church that teaches all Councils are infallible. What the Church does teach, as I posted, is that definitions within Councils are infallible, which agrees with the dogmatic definition of papal infallibility. "...it is a single, as it were, a single cloth woven from the top so that there are no seams, there is a perfect unity."

V2 defined nothing and had no intention of ever defining anything.

The idea that all Councils are infallible is NO and is an idea that is only in perfect unity with LG 25.2.