Me:
"I've never argued that the Church could not survive a long period of pope-lessness."
Me earlier this season:
"...50+ years without a pope is over a generation of people. A few more decades, and the Church is dead, and it will have been proven that Christ's Church is a lie."
Quite right, OHCA. Seems I did make a suggestion that the Church couldn't survive a long period of pope-lessness.
But I would hardly say that I've made an argument in favor of the opinion. I have not argued the feasibility of it at all. It is worth pursuing later on. Not now, though. Too occupied.
As the proprietor of hirschiefiles though, I expect you've been booked solid with coast to coast engagements.
Quite right, OHCA. Quite right. Booked solid. Not with coast-to-coast engagements, of course. But who knows what the future has in store for me.
I truly do wish to remember this point you've brought up. This question: Is it feasible for the Church to survive for a long period without leadership. I do not think it is feasible. I will argue it later on, hopefully.
Oh! And don't forget, OHCA! I've got a new blog post where I compare sedevacantism to feminism! Your encouragement, as always, is appreciated. Read it
here:
Sedevacantism 6: Feminism and how Sedevacantism can be compared with ithttp://thehirschfiles.blogspot.com/2013/12/sedevacantism-6-feminism-and-how.html