Is it easier for converts to accept the hard reality of sedevacantism? It seems so to me.
Unlike cradle Catholics, we’re unburdened by any sentimental attachment to those postconciliar wretches who—however heretical and/or apostate—most cradle Catholics nevertheless view as popes. For example, we didn’t grow up seeing their vile faces in the vestibule and thus cultivating any sense of loyalty to these scuмbags. (By the way, vastly underrated is the damage done by reverently hanging the pictures of these swine in vestibules, especially in vestibules where practical sedevacantism is embraced while vocally preaching against sedevacantism; not only does it create at least a trace of sentimental attachment to these pigs, but it also spawns a kind of painful schizophrenia.)
It is, in part, precisely because I love the papacy that I’ve embraced sedevacantism. The postconciliar pigs cannot possibly be the true occupants of this most exalted of all offices. True fathers do not feed their children stones rather than bread. We’ve been assured of that. And of course, by their fruits ye shall know them. We’ve also been assured of that.
The love of cradle Catholics for the papacy seems to have been fatally eroded by the demonic examples of the postconciliar “popes.” (Love diminished also by their selective obedience). Hence they believe that the office can be held even by diabolical degenerates spewing heresy every day. Hence it’s hard for them to accept the hard reality of sedevacantism.
Anyway, what do you think? Is it easier for converts to accept the hard reality of sedevacantism?