Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Sedevacantism & Converts  (Read 2127 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Sedevacantism & Converts
« Reply #10 on: July 23, 2021, 08:49:12 PM »

Was trying to add the following to my original post:

“Mommy, why is there a picture of that horrible man here in the vestibule? You, Daddy, and Father have called him a total Modernist and thus the embodiment of all heresies!”

Re: Sedevacantism & Converts
« Reply #11 on: July 23, 2021, 09:11:43 PM »
I converted about 10 years through the NO, but quickly realized something was wrong and then came to Tradition. Went to an FSSP parish for 2 years and realized it was an impotent half measure at best and then went to the SSPX which is where I am now. I lean sede, but I am not dogmatic about it. 


Re: Sedevacantism & Converts
« Reply #12 on: July 23, 2021, 09:18:28 PM »
I lean sede, but I am not dogmatic about it.
Despite what some will tell you, there's no dogmatic precedent for it, same with the "non una cuм" issue. It's all theological opinion at this point until a true Pope defines it.

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Re: Sedevacantism & Converts
« Reply #13 on: July 23, 2021, 09:35:48 PM »
Despite what some will tell you, there's no dogmatic precedent for it, same with the "non una cuм" issue. It's all theological opinion at this point until a true Pope defines it.
Yes AND it is equally true that "there's no dogmatic precedent for [Bergoglio is definitely the Pope]. It's all theological opinion at this point until a true Pope defines it."

Re: Sedevacantism & Converts
« Reply #14 on: July 23, 2021, 09:41:47 PM »
Is it easier for converts to accept the hard reality of sedevacantism? It seems so to me.
Not having to submit to a pope can sometimes appeal to a Protestant, but that may lead to Roman Protestantism.

Not saying it's common but I've seen it happen.