Author Topic: Sedevacanism being attacked at CAF (Read 2761 times)

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **on:** November 30, 2010, 09:11:37 PM »

I don't know why I'm able to view the posts over at CAF now since I was banned and originally could not view the forum, but anyway I was over there seeing if the modernists were still running their mouths on the Traditional section and stumbled upon this thread. Not many replies to the thread yet but still interesting. You can tell the guy who started it is a modernist. Have a look.

http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?t=516672

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #1 on:** December 01, 2010, 07:19:20 AM »

Ask the Neo-Caths if they would obey if the Pope allowed women to be ordained.

They will either say yes which shows they are consistent but insane.

They will say it couldn't happen. That means if it did they would have to become Sedes.

They will say they would refuse to obey but he would still be Pope which makes them hypocrites for attacking the Society.

Belloc · « **Reply #2 on:** December 01, 2010, 07:27:11 AM »

CAF is useless as is, really, AQ these days...

Belloc · « **Reply #3 on:** December 01, 2010, 07:28:04 AM »

and we see they are focusing not on real problems, but attacking a small segment of the Church.....ignoring the jupiter sized problems to worry over a bebe

TKGS · « **Reply #4 on:** December 01, 2010, 08:57:37 AM »

I can't view the link directly. Can you tell us which Forum this was on and what the title of the Topic is?

Belloc · « **Reply #5 on:** December 01, 2010, 09:01:19 AM »

unles you are a member, you cannot view their discussions I think
-Lennie :thinking:

TKGS · « **Reply #6 on:** December 01, 2010, 09:15:16 AM »

Quote from: stevusmagnus

Ask the Neo-Caths if they would obey if the Pope allowed women to be ordained.

They will either say yes which shows they are consistent but insane.

They will say it couldn't happen. That means if it did they would have to become Sedes.

They will say they would refuse to obey but he would still be Pope which makes them hypocrites for attacking the Society.

I have asked many Conciliar Catholics this question.

The liberal Novus Ordo types say they would have no problem with it and the answer is therefore, "Yes." If pressed, they say it's only a matter of time.

The conservative Novus Ordo types say that it wouldn't happen but equivocate as whether it could happen and suggest that, if the pope says it's ok, then...well...he has the power of the keys and it's now a done deal and the "policy" against women priests have been "loosed" both on earth and in heaven and therefore, women priests are, from that point forward, perfectly acceptable.

Catholics who are completely attached to the Conciliar structures but who worship mostly with indult communities (such as ICK or FSSP) say it can't happen and absolutely refuse to speculate in, what they say, is an absolute impossible hypothetical. When pressed, however, they refuse to say they would disobey or resist and tend to suggest that they would ultimately come to the same conclusion as the conservative Novus Ordo types I described above.

Quote

unles you are a member, you cannot view their discussions I think

Actually, you can view their discussions, you just can't access them directly. You have to go through they main menu, select which forum you want to view and which topic. You also can't, obviously, post anything. I was just browsing the forum but didn't see the specific post that started this CathInfo topic. I am not a member, nor do I intend to ever become a member.

faith3faith · « **Reply #7 on:** December 01, 2010, 09:46:21 AM »

From CAF:

"Dear Faith3Faith,

You have received an infraction at Catholic Answers Forums.

Reason: Repeated failure to follow rules
-------
On November 26, I gave you an infraction for accusing the pope of speaking contrary to the faith. Today you post the following.

Quote:
Where is the Vicar of Christ who speaks with clear and authoritative teaching? Instead we apparently have a talking head giving his own personal opinions on issues of "Faith and Morals" while doing a book tour and which is throwing many Catholics into a state of confusion, not to mention sɛҳuąƖ immoral sin.

It is obvious that you do not respect our rules. Therefore, your account is suspended for two weeks. Please use the time to think about the need to follow rules and directions from the moderators, if you choose to return to CAF.

Thomas Casey
Moderator"

Belloc · « **Reply #8 on:** December 01, 2010, 09:51:38 AM »

Quote from: TKGS

Quote from: stevusmagnus
Ask the Neo-Caths if they would obey if the Pope allowed women to be ordained.

They will either say yes which shows they are consistent but insane.

They will say it couldn't happen. That means if it did they would have to become Sedes.

They will say they would refuse to obey but he would still be Pope which makes them hypocrites for attacking the Society.

I have asked many Conciliar Catholics this question.

The liberal Novus Ordo types say they would have no problem with it and the answer is therefore, "Yes." If pressed, they say it's only a matter of time.

The conservative Novus Ordo types say that it wouldn't happen but equivocate as whether it could happen and suggest that, if the pope says it's ok, then...well...he has the power of the keys and it's now a done deal and the "policy" against women priests have been "loosed" both on earth and in heaven and therefore, women priests are, from that point forward, perfectly acceptable.

Catholics who are completely attached to the Conciliar structures but who worship mostly with indult communities (such as ICK or FSSP) say it can't happen and absolutely refuse to speculate in, what they say, is an absolute impossible hypothetical. When pressed, however, they refuse to say they would disobey or resist and tend to suggest that they would ultimately come to the same conclusion as the conservative Novus Ordo types I described above.

Quote
unles you are a member, you cannot view their discussions I think

Actually, you can view their discussions, you just can't access them directly. You have to go through they main menu, select which forum you want to view and which topic. You also can't, obviously, post anything. I was just browsing the forum but didn't see the specific post that started this CathInfo topic. I am not a member, nor do I intend to ever become a member.

like I said, me retard-just learning my colors now......

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #9 on:** December 01, 2010, 04:33:38 PM »

Quote from: TKGS

I can't view the link directly. Can you tell us which Forum this was on and what the title of the Topic is?

I can't either anymore. It looks like they deleted the thread. If so then they are doing the same thing as AQ apparently as far as not allowing discussion of sedes. I forgot the name of the thread but it was located in the (so-called) Traditional section.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #10 on:** December 01, 2010, 04:35:00 PM »

Quote from: Belloc

unles you are a member, you cannot view their discussions I think
-Lennie :thinking:

Actually I'm pretty sure you can. Right before I signed up there I took a brief look at a few threads, although had I seen any of the modernist posts I probably would not have signed up.

Edit: Sorry, I see someone already addressed your statement.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #11 on:** December 01, 2010, 04:38:22 PM »

Quote from: faith3faith

From CAF:

"Dear Faith3Faith,

You have received an infraction at Catholic Answers Forums.

Reason: Repeated failure to follow rules
-------
On November 26, I gave you an infraction for accusing the pope of speaking contrary to the faith. Today you post the following.

Quote:
Where is the Vicar of Christ who speaks with clear and authoritative teaching? Instead we apparently have a talking head giving his own personal opinions on issues of "Faith and Morals" while doing a book tour and which is throwing many Catholics into a state of confusion, not to mention sɛҳuąƖ immoral sin.

It is obvious that you do not respect our rules. Therefore, your account is suspended for two weeks. Please use the time to think about the need to follow rules and directions from the moderators, if you choose to return to CAF.

Thomas Casey
Moderator"

They love giving infractions. I find it surprising they allow you to still post there considering you are a sede and nobody there who is non-sede seems to like the sedes. The mods at CAF really sound just as modernist and liberal as the regular members there who are NO people. The mods there always use the term "You did not follow the forum rules/directions". The mod who banned me said it was for "refusal to follow moderator directions". That mod says you don't respect their forum rules. Well, if Traditionalists aren't allowed to speak out against anything modernist then why the heck should we respect their rules?

Telesphorus · « **Reply #12 on:** December 01, 2010, 05:26:43 PM »

CAF is utterly corrupt.

faith3faith · « **Reply #13 on:** December 05, 2010, 08:19:11 AM »

Catholic Answers Forum(CAF) is very anti-Sedevacantist. They'll allow Protestants to take part in discussions, but will silence any Sedevacantist talk. It shows to me that they can't respond to Sedevacantists the way they can respond to Protestants.

MyrnaM · « **Reply #14 on:** December 05, 2010, 08:26:57 AM »

Why bother to even waste your time lurking there? You are not learning anything that you don't already know, Modernism reeks withing the novus ordo, they have left the fold. Wolves in sheeps clothing. Dust off your shoes and read a good spiritual book instead. Just my advice for what its worth.