I think something that most people here learned during the big arguments that took place between the sedes and non-sedes last summer was not to overly-criticize either side. Keep it clean, use constructive criticism, but don't launch ad hominemattacks or use slander. Maybe it's because he wasn't posting at the time these arguments took place, but it's clear that stevus should defend his stance in a kind matter, not go around attacking the sedes.
If you look at me, Matthew, Catholic Samurai, etc. we don't attack the character of the sedes. We defend our stance yet show respect for the sede's stance and whenever we see something ridiculous posted by one of the dogmatic sedes we point it out. It's clear that stevus loves to debate, but perhaps his love for it is unhealthy. He's gone as far as to ask for a sub-forum where sedes aren't allowed to post. Yet he seems to prefer to argue with neo-Caths. It is easy to beat them during debate since they are so far from the truth, yet they don't like Tradition. The sedes at least realize there is a crisis. I'd much rather have sedes on here than modernists.
Anyway, what I'm getting at is that stevus should stop trying to paint the sedes as naive or whatever. That's not a good way to act to a fellow Traditional Catholic. And I must admit that while stevus gets that there is a crisis in the Church, he doesn't seem to get the full picture as far as world-view. To him, Obama is a valid president, 9/11 was the act of Muslims and terrorists, the h0Ɩ0cαųst was for real, etc. Bottom line is that stevus should stop the bickering and show more respect. This is a Traditional Catholic forum, we should be acing like Trads, not fighting all the time.