As St Robert Bellarmine says, even if we could not depose a Pope WHO WANTS TO DESTROY THE CHURCH (note: a pope can have the desire to destroy the Church), we must pray God Who will either CONVERT HIM (note: a Pope may need converting) or abolish him from the midst before he achieves his evil designs.

Stop your sophistry.

There are two answers to your post.

Firstly, without even reading the rest of the Council docuмent, there is a very important question to ask. What is infallible in a Council? Is it every word of every docuмent? Or the definitions? Of course, it is the definitions which are held to be infallible, and what does the definition say (see below)? Why would the Church place all of those conditions there for infallibility if it could have simply said the Pope is infallible "every time he teaches on faith and morals"? It's simple. Stop trying to complicate things. Submit to the Church. Furthermore, the Council states that this definition is IRREFORMABLE. An anathema is attached to anyone who does not accept it as it is, unreformed! Stop your perfidious reforming of Vatican I.

Secondly, and I have responded to you with this explanation before, you must read how the very docuмent that defines infallibility explains these very characteristics that you cite: 1. never failing faith and 2. the Apostolic See unblemished by error. It is precisely in the infallibility as defined by the Council that, according to the very docuмent itself, these two characteristics of never failing faith of Peter and the First See unblemished by error consist. It is pure fantasy on your part to imagine that it means that the Pope can teach no error in faith or morals at all. Read the docuмent for goodness' sake:

In Summary it says "For the Holy Spirit was promised to the successors of Peter... that by His assistance they might religiously guard and faithfully expound the revelation... for they (the Roman Pontiffs) knew very well that this See of Peter always remains unblemished by any error, in accordance with the divine promise... I have prayed for thee that thy faith not fail... This gift of truth and never failing faith was therefore divinely conferred on Peter and his successors SO THAT they might discharge their exalted office for the salvation of all, and so that the whole flock of Christ might be kept away from the poisonous food of error..." But since in this age there are not a few who disparage the authority of the Holy See "We judge it absolutely necessary to affirm solemnly the prerogative" which Our Lord attached to the office of Pope, "THEREFORE, faithfully adhering to the tradition received... we teach and define as a divinely revealed dogma..."

You know the meaning of the word "therefore"? It means for this reason, on account of this.

Listen, Ladislaus, and hear the Church. It is because of this never failing faith of Peter, because of the First See being unblemished by error, that the Council defines the prerogative that Our Lord attached to the office of the Papacy, that infallibility which Our Divine Redeemer willed his Church to enjoy, the tradition faithfully received, the very meaning of its freedom from error and unfailing faith. What is that prerogative? Freedom from error whenever the Pope teaches on Faith and morals? Is that what it says? Read and submit to the Church and stop corrupting the Faith of the Church:

• To satisfy this pastoral office, our predecessors strove unwearyingly that the saving teaching of Christ should be spread among all the peoples of the world; and with equal care they made sure that it should be kept pure and uncontaminated wherever it was received.
• It was for this reason that the bishops of the whole world, sometimes individually, sometimes gathered in synods, according to the long established custom of the churches and the pattern of ancient usage referred to this apostolic see those dangers especially which arose in matters concerning the faith. This was to ensure that any damage suffered by the faith should be repaired in that place above all where the faith can know no failing [59] .
• The Roman pontiffs, too, as the circuмstances of the time or the state of affairs suggested,
  
  
  • sometimes by
    
    
    • summoning ecuмenical councils or
    • consulting the opinion of the churches scattered throughout the world, sometimes by
    • special synods, sometimes by
    • taking advantage of other useful means afforded by divine providence,
  • defined as doctrines to be held those things which, by God’s help, they knew to be in keeping with
    
    
    • sacred scripture and
    • the apostolic traditions.
• For the holy Spirit was promised to the successors of Peter
  
  
  • not so that they might, by his revelation, make known some new doctrine,
  • but that, by his assistance, they might religiously guard and faithfully expound the revelation or deposit of faith transmitted by the apostles.
  Indeed, their apostolic teaching was
  
  
  • embraced by all the venerable fathers and
  • reverenced and followed by all the holy orthodox doctors,
  for they knew very well that this see of St. Peter always remains unblemished by any error, in accordance with the divine promise of our Lord and Saviour to the prince of his disciples: I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail; and when you have turned again, strengthen your brethren [60] .
• This gift of truth and never-failing faith was therefore divinely conferred on Peter and his successors in this see so that they might discharge their exalted office for the salvation of all, and so that the whole flock of Christ might be kept away by them from the poisonous food of error and be nourished with the sustenance of heavenly doctrine. Thus the tendency to schism is removed and the whole church is preserved in unity, and, resting on its foundation, can stand firm against the gates of hell.
• But since in this very age when the salutary effectiveness of the apostolic office is most especially needed, not a few are to be found who disparage its authority, we judge it absolutely necessary to affirm solemnly the prerogative which the only-begotten Son of God was pleased to attach to the supreme pastoral office.
• Therefore,
  
  
  • faithfully adhering to the tradition received from the beginning of the christian faith,
  • to the glory of God our saviour,
  • for the exaltation of the catholic religion and
  • for the salvation of the christian people,
  • with the approval of the sacred council,
    
    

    ---

  • we teach and define as a divinely revealed dogma that
    
    
    • when the Roman pontiff speaks EX CATHEDRA,
      
      
      • that is, when,
      • in the exercise of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians,
      • in virtue of his supreme apostolic authority,
      • he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole church,
    • he possesses,
      
      
      • by the divine assistance promised to him in blessed Peter,
    • that infallibility which the divine Redeemer willed his church to enjoy in defining doctrine concerning faith or morals.
    • Therefore, such definitions of the Roman pontiff are of themselves, and not by the consent of the church, irreformable.

So then, should anyone, which God forbid, have the temerity to REJECT THIS DEFINITION of ours: let him be anathema.

You might, in all good faith 2V, take note of the fact that my post was a response to a sedevacantist whining about R&Rers on our home turf!

You mean like this?

The papacy of old has become an idol - page 2 - Members Only - Catholic Info (cathinfo.com)

Stop trying to pretend that +Williamson or +Lefebvre are sock puppets for your own opinion.  It's really this marked tendency toward Old Catholicism among some R&R that is the true danger to souls.  And, newsflash, if Jorge is pope, we're both in trouble ... since the Church has dogmatically declared that subjection to the Vicar of Christ is necessary for salvation.