Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15]

Author Topic: The Soft Sedevacantist  (Read 13035 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline stevusmagnus

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3728
  • Reputation: +825/-1
  • Gender: Male
    • h
The Soft Sedevacantist
« Reply #210 on: April 17, 2011, 10:54:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Raoul76
    StevusMagnus said:
    Quote
    How do you know I'm not in on the conspiracy? I could be tracking all of your comments for the FBI right now. I could be an agent of the ʝʊdɛօ-Masonic bankers sent to infiltrate and disrupt Traditional Catholic websites. You never can be too sure......    


    Did anyone ever say they were sure you WEREN'T in on it?

    There are definitely moles who disrupt Catholic boards.  And the SSPX produces aggressive, relentless, shamelessly evasive and sophistic gadflies like you by the bucketload.  If you can imagine buckets full of little flies...  


     :tinfoil:
    Logged

    Offline Kailyn

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 99
    • Reputation: +25/-0
    • Gender: Female
    The Soft Sedevacantist
    « Reply #211 on: April 17, 2011, 11:43:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • I still hold the term gadfly as a compliment.  :sad:
    Logged

    Offline Telesphorus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 12713
    • Reputation: +22/-13
    • Gender: Male
    The Soft Sedevacantist
    « Reply #212 on: April 18, 2011, 12:10:09 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: stevusmagnus
    Quote from: Raoul76
    StevusMagnus said:
    Quote
    How do you know I'm not in on the conspiracy? I could be tracking all of your comments for the FBI right now. I could be an agent of the ʝʊdɛօ-Masonic bankers sent to infiltrate and disrupt Traditional Catholic websites. You never can be too sure......    


    Did anyone ever say they were sure you WEREN'T in on it?

    There are definitely moles who disrupt Catholic boards.  And the SSPX produces aggressive, relentless, shamelessly evasive and sophistic gadflies like you by the bucketload.  If you can imagine buckets full of little flies...  


     :tinfoil:


    Since you quoted Sunstein (by wikipedia):

    http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/01/15/sunstein

    Here's another ridiculous quote from a Jєωιѕн anti-conspiracist (speaking of Abbe Augustin Barruel):

    Most remarkably, this evil man and his wicked ideas did much to create both the secret society and antisemitic myths, shaping them into potent forces that for more than a century after his death would profoundly injure Europe and the world.  It is no exaggeration to say his ideas laid some of the intellectual foundations for the views that eventually culminated in the nαzι and Communist regimes.

    Talk about a paranoid, anti-Catholic Jєω!
    Logged

    Offline Raoul76

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4803
    • Reputation: +2007/-6
    • Gender: Male
    The Soft Sedevacantist
    « Reply #213 on: April 18, 2011, 12:50:37 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • There was a list some conspiracy guy like Alex Jones came up with that was pretty good, it showed the different types of moles that infiltrate websites, their various functions... Anyone know what I'm talking about?  

    Stevus and Caminus act like moles, but aren't, since this site is SSPX anyway in orientation.  But when it comes to SSPX, a certain evasiveness and mind-game-playing genius is required that has something in common with communistic tactics.  The SSPX cannot exactly be defended by sound theology, I'm sorry to say.
    Logged
    Readers: Please IGNORE all my postings here. I was a recent convert and fell into errors, even heresy for which hopefully my ignorance excuses. These include rejecting the "rhythm method," rejecting the idea of "implicit faith," and being brieflfy quasi-Jansenist. I also posted occasions of sins and links to occasions of sin, not understanding the concept much at the time, so do not follow my links.

    Offline Telesphorus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 12713
    • Reputation: +22/-13
    • Gender: Male
    The Soft Sedevacantist
    « Reply #214 on: April 18, 2011, 12:55:04 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • There's a tendency towards ruthless nastiness.  But at least this is just a forum.
    Logged

    Offline PartyIsOver221

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1238
    • Reputation: +640/-1
    • Gender: Male
    The Soft Sedevacantist
    « Reply #215 on: April 18, 2011, 09:55:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Raoul76
    There was a list some conspiracy guy like Alex Jones came up with that was pretty good, it showed the different types of moles that infiltrate websites, their various functions... Anyone know what I'm talking about?  

    Stevus and Caminus act like moles, but aren't, since this site is SSPX anyway in orientation.  But when it comes to SSPX, a certain evasiveness and mind-game-playing genius is required that has something in common with communistic tactics. The SSPX cannot exactly be defended by sound theology, I'm sorry to say.



    Raoul is back.


    I remember saying that before a while ago, and that was a fun time we all had!
    Logged

    Offline Caminus

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3013
    • Reputation: +1/-0
    • Gender: Male
    The Soft Sedevacantist
    « Reply #216 on: April 18, 2011, 11:03:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Raoul76
    There was a list some conspiracy guy like Alex Jones came up with that was pretty good, it showed the different types of moles that infiltrate websites, their various functions... Anyone know what I'm talking about?  

    Stevus and Caminus act like moles, but aren't, since this site is SSPX anyway in orientation.  But when it comes to SSPX, a certain evasiveness and mind-game-playing genius is required that has something in common with communistic tactics.  The SSPX cannot exactly be defended by sound theology, I'm sorry to say.


    How exactly do "moles" act?  I wonder if it's by trying to be non-molish?  But if I try to act too non-molish, it would seem reasonable to consider me a mole.  Therefore I ought to act more molish in order to conceal my true intentions -- on a little message board, completely disassociated from real people, no less.  But then, I wonder how exactly to true moles behave?  I really wish we could get some concrete answers here, these are too important to let go by the wayside in light of eternity.  Heaven forbid we would ever not try to consider who is or who is not a true mole.  Ah, this must be part of it -- deflection from the mole question altogether.  But considering that I am responding to the mole problem, I have already failed in my molish behavior.    
    Logged

    Offline gladius_veritatis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 8018
    • Reputation: +2452/-1105
    • Gender: Male
    The Soft Sedevacantist
    « Reply #217 on: July 23, 2011, 08:05:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Caminus
    And even if they do not actually possess the virtue of faith, they at least claim to profess it and that is sufficient for Church membership.


    FWIW, claiming to profess the Faith and actually professing it are different things.  IOW, the "faith" they actually profess is not, in fact, the Catholic Faith.  It is more like a dogma-less humanitarian cupcake with enough Catholic sprinkles to fool the mindless, spineless masses.
    Logged
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."

    Offline PartyIsOver221

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1238
    • Reputation: +640/-1
    • Gender: Male
    The Soft Sedevacantist
    « Reply #218 on: July 23, 2011, 08:22:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • I don't want to be a soft sedevacantist.
    Logged
    Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15]
    « previous next »